![]() ![]() |
Animal Defenders of Westchester |
|
![]()
Home Page We advocate on all animal protection and exploitation issues, including experimentation, factory farming, rodeos, breeders and traveling animal acts. Animal Defenders of Westchester |
Articles 'Dangerous' Dog Registry NY TIMES, March 5, 2006, Westchester section: COUNTY LINES; County's Latest Perp Walk, on All Fours By Marek Fuchs YOU'VE heard of Megan's Law, right? Well, the best and brightest in
Westchester's bureaucracy have now come up with a kind of Megan's Law for
dogs. With the help of town and village clerks, the county is putting a
cruel-canines list online, at Westchester.gov. That is, if the town and
village clerks ever get around to helping. Before I go any further, let me
admit to feelings of apprehension. Not toward county officials -- who
despite all my criticisms gamely return phone calls and behave with
civility. Rather, it is dog owners who inspire fear and trembling. The last time I suggested anything in print about dogs -- in that case,
that they should be leashed in public -- I received a telephone call
threatening physical harm and another creatively describing a plan to pile
dog excrement in front of my apartment door. (I was living in the city then;
here's hoping suburban readers are more genteel and favor e-mail messaging
-- to [email protected] -- over telephoning.) The idea of an offender registry for dogs seemed illogical at the outset
because I had been laboring under the mistaken belief that vicious dogs are
normally just put to ''sleep.'' But it turns out that in New York State, as
in much of the country, the process is lengthier and more legalistic. Anyone who undergoes or witnesses a dog attack or threat can make a
complaint, but then the matter goes to a judge, who has wide discretion. A
judge can order everything from evaluation by a certified behaviorist, to
muzzling, to microchipping, to an increase in the owner's liability
insurance, to home confinement. The judge can also order ''humane
euthanasia,'' as the law puts it. Additionally, since the end of 2004 the law has required the owners of
dogs deemed dangerous by a judge to register them every year with their
village, town or city clerk. Which means, at least in theory, that anyone
who wants to know how many nippy mutts there are in the neighborhood can go
down to the village clerk's office and find out. But all this depends an awful lot on the honor system. There is a $250
fine for not registering a dangerous dog, but perhaps some are risking it,
rather than turning their beloved Spot into an identified public enemy. ''My dog has bitten me and my brother, but he's not declared dangerous,''
said Debbie Henneberry, who is, somewhat paradoxically, clerk of Ardsley.
Although the village now has an official list of dangerous dogs, she said,
it is not very extensive. In fact, even finding a way to license all the
dogs in Ardsley is a challenge. ''We have 1,400 households and only 120
licensed dogs,'' she said, and her implication was clear. I figured that maybe the cities would have bigger numbers of dangerous
dogs registered, their names ready to pass along to the county for the
online master list. But Joan Deierlein, the city clerk in Yonkers, said, as did seven other
clerks I spoke to, that so far no dangerous dogs were locally registered.
Letter carriers would seem to be natural advocates for the registry. But
Robert Morton, president of Letter Carriers Local Branch 693, which covers
several dozen post offices in Westchester, said that wasn't necessarily
true, because post offices already have a detailed internal system designed
to warn carriers of problem dogs. Each carrier has a sorting case in which he or she posts detailed
information about dogs on the daily route. A dog may be described as
friendly normally, for instance, but territorial if outside with the
children. Letter carriers, said Mr. Morton, would probably never have use for a
computer system that merely catalogs potentially troublesome dogs. Dog lovers, unsurprisingly, don't love the list idea, either. Kiley
Blackman, a spokeswoman for the Animal Defenders of Westchester, accused
county officials of trying to score cheap political points by announcing a
policy that is half-baked and could eventually even lead to breed
''profiling.'' ''The county is appearing to do something here,'' she said, ''without
actually doing so much.'' But the county is doing something. It is keeping us safe from unruly
cocker spaniels now, as well as school bullies -- or, at least, expending
considerable effort telling us that it is keeping us safe. When I called the county to ask questions about this new policy, three
top officials got on a conference call with me. Images: Drawing (Drawing by Nancy Doniger) Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company Fair Use Notice: This document may contain
copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the
copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on
the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted
material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner. |
Your comments and
inquiries are welcome
This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.
Since