Animal Defenders of Westchester

Home Page
Action Alerts
Articles
Campaigns
Events
How Can I Help?
Letters
Who We Are
Links

We advocate on all animal protection and exploitation issues, including experimentation, factory farming, rodeos, breeders and traveling animal acts.

Animal Defenders of Westchester
P.O. Box 205
Yonkers, NY 10704

Campaigns
Stop Laboratory Testing on Animals

Dissection: Lessons in Cruelty
From www.peta.org  

Dissection is the practice of cutting into and studying animals.

Every year, 5.7 million animals are used in secondary and college science classes. (1) Each animal sliced open and discarded represents not only a life lost, but also just a small part of a trail of animal abuse and environmental havoc.

Suppliers

Frogs are the most commonly dissected animals below the university level. Other species include cats, mice, rats, worms, dogs, rabbits, fetal pigs, and fishes. The animals may come from breeding facilities which cater to institutions and businesses that use animals in experiments; they may have been caught in the wild; or they could be stolen or abandoned companion animals.

One of PETA's undercover investigators at one of the nation's largest suppliers of animals for dissection was told by his supervisor that some of the cats killed there were companion animals who had "escaped" from their homes.

Slaughterhouses and pet stores also sell animals and animal parts to biological supply houses.

PETA investigators documented cases of animals being removed from gas chambers and injected with formaldehyde without first being checked for vital signs (a violation of the Animal Welfare Act).

(Formaldehyde is a severely irritating caustic substance which causes a painful death.) Investigators videotaped cats and rats struggling during infusion and employees spitting on the animals.

Depleting the Ecosystem

Frogs are captured in the wild to stock breeding ponds because populations die out if not replenished. A completely independent frog colony has never survived long without the introduction of "outside" frogs. (2)

In their natural habitat, frogs consume large numbers of insects responsible for crop destruction and the spread of disease. In the years preceding India's ban on the frog trade, that country was earning $10 million a year from frog exports, but spending $100 million to import chemical pesticides to fight insect infestations. (3) In addition, economic losses in agricultural produce were heavy.

Today, Bangladesh is the main Asian market for frogs, and in the United States, scientists have noted severe declines in frog and toad populations that they blame on the capture of these animals for food and experiments, as well as on causes of general environmental decline such as the use of pesticides and habitat destruction. (4)

Killing Compassion Along With the Frog

Classroom dissection desensitizes students to the sanctity of life and can encourage students to harm animals elsewhere, perhaps in their own backyard. In fact, serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer attributed his fascination with murder and mutilation to classroom dissections.

In the last interview before his death, televised on Dateline NBC, Dahmer stated, "In 9th grade, in biology class, we had the usual dissection of fetal pigs, and I took the remains of that [pig] home

and kept the skeleton of it, and I just started branching out to dogs, cats." According to Dahmer, he enjoyed the excitement and power he experienced when cutting up animals and fantasized about cutting up a human body.

Students with little or no interest in pursuing a career in science certainly don't need to see actual organs to understand basic physiology, and students who are planning on pursuing a career in biology or medicine would do better to study humans in a controlled, supervised setting, or to study human cadavers or some of the sophisticated alternatives, such as computer models. Those who are rightfully disturbed by the prospect of cutting up animals will be too preoccupied by their concerns to learn anything of value during the dissection.

Students Speak Up

More and more students are taking a stand against dissection before it happens in their classes, from the elementary school level on up to veterinary and medical school. In 1987, Jenifer Graham objected to dissection and was threatened with a lower grade. Jenifer went to court to plead her case and later testified before the California legislature, which responded by passing a law giving students in the state the right not to dissect. Jenifer's mother and the National Anti-Vivisection Society have set up a hotline for students who want to avoid dissection.

Since Jenifer's case, thousands of students have opted to study biology in humane ways, and many schools have accepted the students' right to violence-free education.

Alternatives

Students and teachers may choose from a wide range of sophisticated alternatives to dissection. The typical science "lab" at many schools now emphasizes computers rather than animal cadavers.

Computer programs such as VisiFrog, available from Ventura Educational Systems (910 Ramona Ave., Suite E, Grover Beach, CA 93433: 1-800-473-7383), can be used as either a lesson or a test.

Programs include an identification game and a self-quiz, covering topics such as frog musculature, cardiovascular system, and respiratory system. As of this writing, the system costs $59.95.

Operation Frog, made by Scholastic, Inc. (2931 E. McCarty St., P.O. Box 7502, Jefferson City, MO 65102; 1-800-541-5513), costs $79.95 to $99.95, depending on the type of software. It simulates an actual dissection on the computer.

The Cambridge Development Laboratory (86 West St., Waltham, MA 02154; 1-800-637-0047) has a selection of educational software for the Apple II, Commodore 64, and IBM PC for elementary through college level classes in biology, botany, physiology, and more.

Many books also offer humane science lessons. The Anatomy Coloring Book and The Zoology Coloring Book, both published by Harper & Row, Inc., (10 East 53rd St., New York, NY 10022) are appropriate for high school and college students. These books are available in many bookstores for $10.95 and $11.95, respectively.

Most non-animal tools and lessons last for many years and cost less than maintaining a constant supply of animals. Because computer methods allow students to learn at their own pace, they have proved to be as good as, and often superior to, dissection as a learning tool.(5)

University of Virginia professor Mabel B. Kinzie compared students who used the interactive "frog" videodisc she developed with those who cut up real frogs. She found that students using the computer program learned anatomy just as thoroughly--in an environment that didn't reek of formaldehyde or require killing a living being.(6)

Every Student's Choice

Whether you are a student, a parent, or a concerned taxpayer, you can act to end dissection in your town's school system. If you are expected to perform or observe a dissection, talk to your teacher as early as possible about alternative projects.

Call the NAVS dissection hotline,1-800-922-FROG [3764], for tips on what to say and how to proceed. If there is an animal rights group at your school or in your community, ask them to help.

Parents can urge their local Parent-Teacher Association to ask the area superintendent of schools or school board to consider a proposal to ban dissections in public schools or at least give all students the option of doing a non- animal project. It may help to collect signatures on a petition and to present the school board with information on the cruelty and environmental destruction caused by animal dissection and on readily available alternatives. If you can, arrange to show PETA's video on biological supply companies, "Classroom Cut-Ups."

Get your school to drop dissection--it's deadly.

References

National Anti-Vivisection Society, "Objecting to Dissection--A Student Handbook" (53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1552, Chicago, IL, 60604; 800-922-3764), 1994.

Ethical Science Education Coalition, Frog Fact Sheet (167 Milk St., #423, Boston, MA, 02109-4315; 617-367-9143), 1994.

Jayaraman, K.S., "India Bans Frog Trade," Animal Welfare Institute Quarterly, Spring/Summer 1987.

Booth, William, "Frogs, Toads Vanishing Across Much of World," The Washington Post, Dec. 13, 1989.

"Comparative Studies of Dissection and Other Animal Uses in Education," The Humane Society of the United States, 1994.

Orndorff, Beverly, "Computer Program Is a Frog Saver," Richmond Times-Dispatch, April 5, 1994.


Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Your comments and inquiries are welcome

(d-2)


This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.


Since date.gif (991 bytes)