Animals In Print
The On-Line Newsletter
26 May 2010 Issue

| Newsletter Directory | Action Alerts | Poetry | Our Staff | Subscription Information | Links | Visitor Comments |

BREAKING NEWS
The untold story of Iditarod drug testing


By Margery Glickman, Director

For twenty-six years the Iditarod ignored its own drug testing policy. This year, Stan Hooley, executive director of the Iditarod Trail Committee, announced that all mushers would be tested along the trail. But that's not what happened. Top mushers were tested for drugs at White Mountain, which is the second-to-last checkpoint. Other mushers were tested after they crossed the finish line in Nome. But the sixteen mushers who dropped out of the race were never given drug tests.

The Iditarod Trail Committee did not make public its list of prohibited drugs for the 2010 race. But here's what we do know: In August 2009, the Iditarod Board of Directors voted to adopt the list of prohibited drugs, as presented at its meeting. On the list was "marijuana, cocaine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, opiates (codeine/morphine) and synthetic opiates (hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxymorphone) and add propoxyphene." This list is not in compliance with the World Anti-Doping Agency's Code or International Standards, including its list of "Substances and Methods Prohibited at all Times (In-And Out-Of Competition)."

Under Iditarod "Rule 29-Use of Drugs and Alcohol," violators of the race's drug and alcohol policy may be disqualified from a particular race or be ineligible to participate for a specified period of time in future races, or both. The Iditarod didn't commit to punish violators of its rule, and it didn't commit itself to report illegal activity to local authorities.

Before the start of the 2010 race, executive director Stan Hooley said that any positive drug tests results would be announced and violators would be named. Forty-seven days after the Iditarod ended, he revealed that two mushers who finished in the bottom 15 tested positive for Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. Race officials refused to identify the mushers who tested positive and refused to sanction them. According to the Iditarod's website, the following 15 mushers finished in the bottom 15: Cindy Gallea, Sam Deltour, Blake Freking, Tamara Rose, Arthur Church, Jr., Wattie McDonald, Lachlan Clarke, Newton Marshall, Billy Snodgrass, Trent Herbst, Chris Adkins, Dave DeCaro, Ross Adam, Jane Faulkner and Scott White.

Iditarod musher Jeff King told the Anchorage Daily News that drug testing is a waste of money. Could King be right? Is effective drug testing a myth? The Iditarod Board's list of prohibited drugs certainly isn't all inclusive. Is it possible for any list to include every drug? "You can test for designer drugs, but only if you know what you're looking for," said Jon Danaceau, an associate toxicologist at the University of Utah Center for Human Toxicology. Sophisticated tests can't always tell the difference between synthetic versions of what the body already makes. And there are so many new drugs that testers can't keep up. Gene doping is on the horizon and that's almost impossible to detect.

Drug testing still makes sense even though it has its limits. The Iditarod should do whatever it takes to ensure the health and welfare of the dogs. Mushers who suffer adverse effects from drugs will most likely do a worse job of caring for their animals. The best we can hope for is that the Iditarod adopts the World Anti-Doping Agency's Code and International Standards, including its list of "Substances and Methods Prohibited at all Times (In-And Out-Of Competition)," and that the Iditarod examines mushers before the race and at every checkpoint, and vows to report and punish violators.

Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org


Iditerod: A Tough Journey For Dogs

Iditerod: A Tough Journey For Dogs


Go on to Next Newsletter Topic
Return to 26 May 2010 Issue
Return to Newsletter Directory

| Home Page | Newsletter Directory |

Please send comments and submittals to the Editor: Linda Beane Ljbeane1@aol.com

Animals in Print - A Newsletter concerned with: advances, alerts, animal, animals, attitude, attitudes, beef, cat, cats, chicken, chickens, compassion, consciousness, cows, cruelty, dairy, dog, dogs, ecology, egg, eggs, education, empathy, empathize, empathise, environment, ethics, experiment, experiments, factory, farm, farms, fish, fishing, flesh, food, foods, fur, gentleness, health, human, humans, non-human, hunting, indifference, intelligent, intelligence, kindness, lamb, lambs, liberation, medical, milk, natural, nature, newsletters, pain, pig, pigs, plant, plants, poetry, pork, poultry, research, rights, science, scientific, society, societies, species, stories, study, studies, suffering, test, testing, trapping, vegetable, vegetables, vegan, veganism, vegetarian, vegetarianism, water, welfare


This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.
Since date.gif (991 bytes)