2012 Demonstrations Against Canadian Harp Seal Slaughter

From all-creatures.org
Action Alerts

Moo-ving people toward compassionate living

Your letters and calls do help!

"Be the change you wish to see in the world" ~Mohandas Gandhi
"Our lives began and end the day we become silent things that matter" ~Martin Luther King, Jr.

Originally Posted: March 14, 2012

2012 Demonstrations Against Canadian Harp Seal Slaughter

[Ed. Note: Action - Stop Supporting 2012 Canadian Seal Hunt and read Canadian Senate Proves Conservatives Are a Tad Dumb.]

FROM HarpSeals.org

ACTION

Search here by zip code for an event in your area!

INFORMATION / TALKING POINTS

Frequently Asked Questions:

1) Wasn't this hunt stopped in the 70's? I thought that Brigitte Bardot and Greenpeace ended this years ago. What's up?

Brigitte Bardot in Ottawa in 2006

A: Since the first protest in 1955, those who wished to stop the killing have filmed the horrors, published articles about it, obtained proclamations from the U.S. and foreign governments in opposition to the killing, proposed and facilitated alternative sources of income for seal killers, written countless letters to Canadian officials, and staged demonstrations around the world. The U.S. Congress introduced legislation in 1972 to ban the importation of commodities made from marine mammals, but it wasn't until a worldwide outcry led to European actions in the 1980's- the ban on the importation of baby seal pelts (whitecoats) in 1983, and the threat of a boycott of Canadian fish products in 1987- that the killing declined dramatically. But it never ended. The Canadian government and the sealing industry worked tirelessly to develop new markets to replace those eliminated by these actions; and the government required that seal killers wait until seal pups molted at about 2 weeks of age, when, according to the government, they become adults.

An average of 60,000 seals were killed each year between 1984 and 1994. In 1995, the commercial hunt was resumed when a Newfoundlander named Brian Tobin became the Minister of Fisheries. This was two years after the cod fishery collapsed due to over-fishing. The fishermen blamed the seals for the decline of the cod and demanded a kill. Since 1994, the kill quota has risen each year. Markets were developed in Asia; and seal skins were sold in the seal killing nation, Norway, as well as in Denmark, Poland, Estonia, and Greece. The three year plan ending in 2005 was to kill almost one million seals. When the "struck and lost" seals are included, the total killed exceeds one million, making this the largest marine mammal slaughter in the world. Still the Newfoundlanders are not satisfied and are demanding that even more seals be killed. Some Newfoundland politicians have called for eradication. As an aside, it is a mistake to credit Greenpeace with ending the hunt. Greenpeace was one of the organizations opposing the hunt between 1976 and 1982. There were many other organizations involved including the International Fund for Animal Welfare, the Fund for Animals and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. From 1984 until 2005, Greenpeace refrained from actively opposing the hunt. (see more details about the annual Canadian seal slaughter)

2) Where do the pelts go? Are any sold in Canada? What country buys the most pelts?

A: Most of the pelts are first purchased by processors in Newfoundland. The main companies are Carino, based in South Dildo, Newfoundland, and Atlantic Marine Products, with its main plant in Catalina, Newfoundland.

Seal skin coats
Carino is a subsidiary of a Norwegian company named Karl Rieber and Sons based in Bergen, Norway. NuTan Furs, formerly known as Atlantic Marine Products is a subsidiary of the Barry Group, a major seafood processor and exporter in Atlantic Canada.

After the pelts are processed, some are sold in Canada but most are imported into Norway. In 2004, other major importers were Greenland, Germany, China, Poland, Denmark, Hong Kong, Greece, France, Russia, and South Korea (in order from most to least number of pelts imported). In prior years, Ukraine, Estonia, and Japan also imported large numbers of pelts.

The pelts are sold in Canada, Europe, Asia, and possibly other parts of the world, but they are not sold in the United States due to the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The Canadian government is currently developing plans to subvert this treasured environmental protection through such measures as appeals to the World Trade Organization and NAFTA boards.

The slaughter of the seals is not by itself economically viable. The wholesale prices typically vary between CAN$30 and CAN$50 for the most perfect skins. Without government subsidies, including the work of the Coast Guard in carving paths through the ice for the sealing boats, the commercial seal "hunt" would not survive. (See more details about the seal skins and fur market)

3) What happens to the meat of the seals after they are killed?

A: Most of the meat is left to rot. Some if it is sold to fur farms and some is ground up into animal feed. A few thousand seal flippers are sold for human consumption in Newfoundland. There was also a growing demand for the seal penis bone in the Far East as some sort of remedy for impotence. The penis bones were typically taken from adult males. This market has been impacted by the commercialization of drugs like Viagra.

4) Why do they kill them with clubs? Why not use bullets?

A: Most of the younger seals are killed with clubs or hakapiks in order to avoid damage to their pelts with a bullet hole. This would reduce the value of the pelt.

Since older seals are faster, more aggressive, and can swim, most are shot at a distance with high powered rifles to limit their ability to escape. Since sealers shoot for the head to avoid damage to the pelt, and this is a difficult shot, many seals are only wounded by the first gunshot. Sealers will often try to club a wounded seal, but these wounded seals will head for the nearest open water where they often will simply slip away under the ice and perish. (See the hunt page for more details about the hunt)

5) You guys (opposing the seal hunt) aren't against native peoples killing seals, are you? What gives?

A: There are few indigenous peoples involved in the commercial seal "hunt", defined as the slaughter of seals for their pelts, which are sold for fur coats and accessories. Most of the sealers in the Gulf of St. Lawrence are residents of the Magdalen Islands of Quebec. These are French speaking people. Most of the sealers on the Newfoundland Front are descendents of British immigrants. The Inuit, or native Canadians, we (and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans of Canada) treat the same as the Caucasian sealers.

On the other hand, we do not campaign for an end to the sealing by the Inuit who live a subsistence lifestyle. These individuals, by definition, do not export pelts. They kill only the seals they need to and use all the parts of the carcass. These Inuit live and hunt mostly in the arctic and primarily kill ringed seals.

6) Is there a black market for any seal products?

A: With the exception of the seal penis bone market in Asia, there is not really a black market for seal products because there is little demand for them. However, whenever a sealer exceeds his quota, there are no legal consequences. Sealers in Canada have a license to torture, mutilate, and kill over quota without fear of repercussions.(See the hunt page for more details about the hunt)

7) If polls show that the majority of Canadian citizens are against the hunt, why don't they just stop it with a vote?

A: The Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans is a bureaucracy run primarily by Newfoundlanders. They set the policy. Politicians have basically rubber-stamped the wishes of the bureaucrats. Most of the Fisheries Ministers have hailed from Newfoundland. Another problem is that there is much competition between the political parties to control Newfoundland and any party that opposes the seal hunt is out of the running. Therefore the parties have all agreed to support the hunt, leaving no alternatives for people who are opposed to the hunt. Even the Green Party of Newfoundland supports the seal kill for fear of losing votes. (See the Politics, Propaganda, and Culture page for more insight)

8) What advantages or positive things does Canada get from the seal hunt?

A: Really Canada gets very little that is positive from the seal hunt - just CAN$10 to $20 million, most of which goes to skin processing companies and sealing boat captain.s On the contrary, Canada receives a great deal of bad press because of the seal slaughter. It does not receive much in the way of income and the seal hunt contributes practically nothing to the Gross National Product of the country. On the contrary, the hunt is a negative drain on the economy because of tax dollars spent to subsidize it. (See the Politics, Propaganda, and Culture page for more insight)

9) There's a war going on and other animal species going exctinct all around the world. Why should I care about Canadian seals?

A: There is always a war going on someplace. People are continually fighting amongst themselves. There is also another war going on and that is the war against nature and against wildlife. All marine mammals are faced with extinction because of hunting, pollution, and destruction of habitat, and depletion of the fish stocks they depend on.

There is no justification for waging this, the world's second largest slaughter of a mammalian species (second only to the Kangaroo, in Australia) and the largest slaughter of any marine mammals. In addition, the hunt is cruel, driven by vanity and greed (for fur), economically wasteful, propped up by subsidies and bolstered by propaganda.

10) Are there alternative ways for the sealers to make a living?

A. Sealers earn most (about 95%) of their living as fishermen. As they deplete the oceans by over-fishing, destroying habitat with bottom trawlers, and indiscriminately killing sea life with long liners and other fishing technologies, their income from fishing is likely to decline. Sealing never has offered a lucrative alternative or supplement to the fishermen's income. Most of the proceeds from sealing go to boat captains and seal skin processors.

Capt. Paul Watson of Sea Shepherd demonstrates brushing of molting harp seal pup (c) Sea Shepherd
Nevertheless, sealers have been offered alternatives, such as 'seal brushing'. Each individual hair follicle of the whitecoat seal pups is hollow, keeping the babies warm and happy in the subzero temperatures. As the babies continue to their second stage of growth, they begin to molt and lose this outer layer of hair. This is when they can be easily brushed and the hair collected for bedding and other applications. Paul Watson and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society have attempted on multiple occasions to introduce this idea to the Canadian sealers, even finding a businessman who offered more money for each brushed seal than the sealers could make from the pelt. Unfortunately, the idea was rejected time after time.

The sealers reasoning for rejection? As one sealer put it in 1999 in the Magdelein Islands, "Seals are meant to be clubbed, not brushed. We don't want nothing to do with no faggoty idea like that".

Another alternative for the sealers is seal tourism. Some sealers already make money this way - before the sealing starts. This could supplement their income more if the seal hunt ended. Many who know about the slaughter choose not to support the sealing communities with tourism as long as the seal hunt continues.

11) What can I do about it?

A: Get involved. Check out our help section for ideas on opposing the slaughter of seals... And sign up now to join our Seal Action Team (no particular commitments necessary; just the desire to help)!


These questions were asked by a Newfoundland college student and answered by veteran seal warriors, Capt. Paul Watson of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and Rebecca Aldworth of HSUS). 


Thank you for everything you do for animals!