Denying an animal rights club is violating a students’ First Amendment rights.
Naomi Mathew on the Truman State University campus. Image credit Rivera Eye
Photography for FIRE.
When Naomi Mathew tried to start an animal rights club at Missouri’s
Truman State University, she expected to speak with fellow students about an
issue that matters deeply to her. But after a committee of students and
administrators rejected her club due to concerns about the “emotional risk”
of “hostile” confrontations and the “reputational risk” of associating with
PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), it’s Mathew’s First
Amendment rights that are endangered.
Today, with the help of the
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
(FIRE), she is fighting back.
“It seems like the university has something against us,” Mathew said.
“Truman State needs to stop making excuses and recognize our group. We
understand that many people don’t like the idea of animal rights, but we
still deserve the same platform as the other groups on campus.”
Students forming the Animal Alliance had done everything necessary: Mathew
submitted an application form, selected an adviser, and identified more than
10 interested students. But following a hearing and closed-door
deliberations, administrators denied their application on November 21st,
citing “the emotional risk” of potentially hostile student reactions, and
the possibility that police responding to such situations could be
emotionally upsetting to other students. Administrators also expressed
concern about the “reputational risk” of associating with PETA.
Groups without official recognition can be denied a wide range of resources,
including funding, room reservations, and the ability to publicize events on
campus.
Animal Alliance is the third prospective student group promoting veganism or
vegetarianism to be denied recognition in as many years. The university
rejected a proposed Vegetarian Club in 2017, after a committee member
objected to part of its mission statement as “very very very extreme” and
said they would not go vegetarian themselves.
Yesterday, FIRE wrote to Truman State President Susan Thomas, asking her to
recognize Animal Alliance and stop violating students’ First Amendment
rights.
“Truman State can’t reject student groups just because it doesn’t like
what they might say, or what others may say in response,” said Lindsie Rank,
the author of FIRE’s letter. “The law is clear: Naomi Mathew and her fellow
students are free to exercise their First Amendment freedoms without a
university committee making subjective decisions behind closed doors about
what students can and can’t handle.”
Truman State is no stranger to denying club recognition to a wide array of
prospective organizations. Since 2015, administrators have denied at least
43 prospective groups, including those advocating for first-generation
college students, transgender students, and children with cancer. Other
groups to face Truman’s axe include clubs promoting religious causes, the
elimination of the global slave trade, and consent in sexual relationships.
“Any system that results in students being asked what ‘emotional risk’ might
come from associating with like-minded individuals and then being told that
risk is too great is cruel and raises serious questions about the
institution’s fair-weather friendship with the First Amendment,” said Adam
Steinbaugh, director of FIRE’s Individual Rights Defense Program. “Students’
rights can’t be subordinated to what administrators feel is in their best
emotional interest.”
Universities may use objective criteria to grant or deny student groups’
bids for official recognition. But Truman State’s subjective process
violates students’ First Amendment rights and results in a double standard,
with some controversial groups approved and others ousted. FIRE will
continue to monitor the situation and use all the resources at its disposal
to ensure a just outcome.
Truman State’s namesake said: “Real Americanism means that we will protect
freedom of speech — we will defend the right of people to say what they
think, regardless of how much we may disagree with them.”
Return to: Animal Rights/Vegan Activist Strategies