Psychic numbing is a psychological phenomenon that renders us indifferent to the suffering of large numbers of individuals. The human mind is not well equipped to think about millions or billions of individuals. And this is true whether we are talking about any marginalized community, be they mice or men.... if people in our social circles aren’t even able to conceive of the value of millions of human lives, are they really prepared to conceive of farmed animals and others as individuals?
Perhaps you’ve seen this meme before or variations of it while scrolling
through your social media feeds. Impossibly huge number of human lives lost
juxtaposed near impossibly huge number of animal lives lost. We often reason
that these monolithic numbers will move our friends to action.
But chances are high that your friends don’t even read those memes before
they scrolled on by.
Does this mean that you’re surrounded by soulless monsters? Well, probably
not.
As the number of victims in a tragedy increases, our empathy shuts off the
lights and closes the blinds. This happens even when the number of victims
increases from one to two. This paradox is known as psychic numbing.
What’s psychic numbing?
Psychic numbing is a psychological phenomenon that renders us indifferent to
the suffering of large numbers of individuals. The phrase was popularized by
Paul Slovic, a psychologist at the University of Oregon. Slovic’s work asks
the question: Why does the world often ignore mass atrocities? And the
answer is simple. The human mind is not well equipped to think about
millions or billions of individuals. And this is true whether we are talking
about any marginalized community, be they mice or men.
Take, for example, that meme. Are you mentally capable of considering what
153 million animals looks like? Really really? When we see one life, we can
imagine their hopes and pain. But 153 million is a complete abstraction.
Human compassion has a hard limit, and that hard limit profoundly shapes
human events.
But every coin has two sides. And if more victims only results in further
apathy, then the opposite of psychic numbing is...
The Singularity Effect
The singularity effect occurs when an individual life is valued very
highly. Our immediate response to a single individual in distress is to
protect them. But that response is not proportional as the number of
individuals increases.
This explains why we root for a cow who escaped the slaughterhouse, but our
collective care leaps straight out the window when we order a steak during
our next lunch.
So then what does this mean for animal advocates?
According to Slovic, individual stories and individual photographs can be
effective. They help us glimpse harsh realities at a scale we can connect to
emotionally. But then there has to be somewhere to go with it.
In an interview with journalist Brian Resnick, Slovic explained this by way
of a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
This study focused on Aylan Kurdi, the Syrian boy whose drowned body was
photographed lying on a beach.
Since 2011, the death toll in Syria marched steadily into the six figure
region and public reaction was fairly unmoved. However, researchers analyzed
the reaction to that photograph and people were properly shook. Kurdi caused
people to care about the Syrian war in ways that statistics on hundreds of
thousands of deaths had failed to do. But it’s important to…
Mobilize people while their empathy is engaged because the window of
care is unforgivably small.
Slovic said, “It's not enough to break through the numbing. You have to give
people somewhere to go. You have to then have some action options that they
can take.”
In the example of the Syrian war and resulting refugees, there were several
actions that people could take. Slovic told Resnick:
“In Sweden, where they had taken in 160,000 Syrian refugees, the Swedish Red
Cross had created a fund to get money to help take care of this mass influx.
The day after that photograph appeared, donations went from $8,000 to
$430,000 — because of the photograph. Then we could see over time how ... it
stayed elevated for about a month or so, and then it went back [down].
These dramatic stories of individuals or photographs give us a window of
opportunity where we're suddenly awake and not numbed, and we want to do
something. If there's something we can do, like donate to the Red Cross,
people will do it. But then if there's nothing else they can do, then over
time that gets turned off again.”
So take this into consideration the next time you post a meme showing
statistics of animal violence that might be challenging for people to grasp.
Those memes aren’t necessarily ineffective. But there might be more creative
ways to use social media to make the same point.
After all, if people in our social circles aren’t even able to conceive of
the value of millions of human lives, are they really prepared to conceive
of farmed animals and others as individuals?
Even Joseph Stalin recognized that “One death is a tragedy; a million deaths
is a statistic.” And he’s the guy most remembered for competing with Hitler
for western civilization’s greatest villain!
Return to: Animal Rights/Vegan Activist Strategies