HOME ABOUT CAMPAIGNS CRISIS CENTER ACTIVIST CENTER MEDIA CENTER HUNTING ACCIDENTS C.A.S.H. NEWSLETTER

CASH Courier > 2005 Winter Issue

Selected Articles from our newsletter

The C.A.S.H. Courier

ARTICLE from the Winter 2005 Issue

Is Our Species Evolving or Developing
The Evolution Solution of Charles les Darwin Himself....

BY E. L. EIDOLON

The US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had been trying unsuccessfully to “ban” sea otters from most California waters for years. They did that to appease the fishermen who saw the otters as competition.


Photo by Laura Martin, http://pics.tech4learning.com 

They would relocate sea otters only to have them return. One otter named Phokey is a legend in the annals of this relocation scheme because no matter how far they sent him by boat or plane, no matter how disoriented they themselves would have been, it never took Phokey long to find his way back.

In recent days in California, biologists have admitted defeat (by the otters) and have thrown in the towel. They are on the verge of allowing the sea otters to swim free again, instead of moving them far away. It was about the only smart move made by the FWS because, though it took awhile, they are now aware that the otters continued to return to the place where they wanted to be. “Otter does not live by bread alone,” one might say. They want to be happy and it means exactly the same for them as it does for us. Why does the FWS find that so difficult to understand?

Why do the people who have control of wildlife insist on ignoring the fact that wild animals are the result of thousands of generations of development? These agencies are blinded to the animals’ emotional facet; not wishing to recognize that, along with the physical and mental components, the emotional component is an essential part of who they are.

It’s easy to see and share happiness with your household pets and only a fool would suggest that dogs and cats are without emotions or incapable of pain. So, why is there a denial of this by wildlife agencies and why is this obvious fact ridiculed by them?

Anthropomorphism (identifying with or finding human-like aspects in animals and birds) had a famous early adherent who justified it and expanded on it. In The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, Charles Darwin proposed not only physical evolution but emotional evolution.

He suggests (for lack of a better term) a tribal memory built into animals and birds within a species and that includes man. He described it as the carrying over into the next generation certain emotional and behavioral patterns which define a species. He described emotions which we share, man and beast.

The proposal adds a dimension to the lives of animals most of us only acknowledge when we can identify with some element of it, such as mother/child affection, bravery, protection, etc. but clearly animals are capable of these feelings and more. Acknowledging this often comes at a time when the sameness overcomes the differences in life and can no longer be ignored. Often, it results in hunters putting down their guns and picking up cameras.

Mute swans wag their tails like a puppy when they approach their family or human friends. They raise their heads slightly in greeting. Elephants cry. Parrots use words such as “ sad “ appropriately, evidencing that they read facial expressions.

Research reinforces the observations of Konrad Lorenz, the highly regarded 20th Century Austrian ethologist. Theodore Xenophon Barber, a behavioral scientist, wrote “The Human Nature of Birds, A Scientific Discovery with Startling Implications,” in which he discusses not only the communication and understanding skills of many bird species, but their emotional realm as well. He noted their mourning, happiness and joy not as instinct or reflex, but as emotional episodes. Communication is not just a sound, it fits within a context and has relevance to the listener. Birds are capable of that.

I wonder how many grants were given and birds were killed, to “discover” in the laboratory what many bird fanciers have known all along.

I have researched the Trumpeter Swan Society papers recently and found many, many instances where so-called “experts” suggested these birds were stupid. They discussed the mishandling of hundreds of birds, resulting in many deaths, as though they were talking about a chair or stone. This is, unfortunately, not unusual in the field of wildlife management; denigration and denying the substance of animals is in fact encouraged.

Seeing wildlife agents refute the intelligence and sensitivities of animals should not be so great a surprise when we see this attitude displayed against fellow humans as well. Our own species seems to be comprised of individuals who possess varying degrees of emotional and intellectual capacity; indeed some seem to be devolving. Our species’ valuing of all life is a work in progress that sadly few have attained.

I urge you to read or reread The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals by Charles Darwin and gain strength from the sensitive, intelligent descriptions of the whole range of emotions we all carry and share with our non-human relatives. It is at once both ennobling and humbling.

We don’t have to look out at a vast dark sky and say “We are not alone.” We are, here on earth, surrounded by non-human intelligent life.

E. L. Eidolon may be contacted through C.A.S.H.

Go on to LOHV NEWS - The 2005 Elections
Back to 2005 Winter Issue
Back to C.A.S.H. Courier Article Archive

 
 

Home  |  About  |  Campaigns  |  Crisis Center  |  Activists  |  Media  |  Hunting Accidents  |  Newsletter

C.A.S.H.
PO Box 562 New Paltz, NY 12561
Phone 845-256-1400 Fax 845-818-3622
E-mail: cash@cashwildwatch.org
Anne Muller - President

 

C.A.S.H. is a committee of Wildlife Watch, Inc.
a 501(c)3 Not-for-Profit Corporation.
Contributions are tax-deductible.

All content copyright C.A.S.H. unless otherwise noted.

We welcome your comments
   

Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org

Sponsored & Maintained by The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation