HOME ABOUT CAMPAIGNS CRISIS CENTER ACTIVIST CENTER MEDIA CENTER HUNTING ACCIDENTS C.A.S.H. NEWSLETTER

CASH Courier > 2006 Fall Issue

Selected Articles from our newsletter

The C.A.S.H. Courier

ARTICLE from the Fall 2006 Issue

Modifying The Landscape Can Entice Canada Geese To Move On

By Susan Russell
Excerpted from the full report.

In nature, no creature, especially man, exists in a vacuum. Results will follow cause.

Canada geese respond to injurious human landscaping practices and government and private waterfowl restocking programs. The leading federal researchers agree: The birds pose no human health threat.

The facts beg one question: When our actions, appetites or whims have consequences for other species, how should we respond?

Landscaping. Simple landscapes — mowed turf grass near water, open vistas — play havoc with the Canada goose’s migratory and nesting instincts. Protective parents seek clear, line-of-sight vistas that allow for ready identification of predators.

The local park/pond/playground combo and the home association’s manicured pond are neon vacancy signs for nesting geese. The ecological hitch: These structurally simple landscapes are not indigenous to the Northeast. Scientists say that nesting geese are an ecological symptom, not the disease. Denuded of native vegetation and wildlife, poorly landscaped parks are the biological equivalent of an indoor swimming pool.

Experts advise that natural landscaping is the answer. “Geese, like other waterfowl, are attracted to habitats that meet their basic needs,” notes Transport Canada. “Habitat modification is the best overall approach to long-term bird control.”

“Communities that no longer enjoy the company of geese need to withdraw their invitation,” writes the Delaware Riverkeeper. “Anger, stone throwing, scare tactics, use of dogs and egg addling are neither the right nor the most effective response. The most effective, sustainable and cost beneficial way to force geese to move on, to continue their migration, is to revegetate our stream banks and shorelines.”

Ecological restoration can reduce pesticide dependence, improve immediate soil, air and water quality, promote a desired natural aesthetic, and restore habitat for humans and wildlife.

Diagrammed habitat modification guides provide managers with practical principles for landscape restoration. Limited restoration improves and beautifies landscapes for many species, including humans. Modification for geese means blocking vistas by strategic placement of shrubs, grasses, wildflowers, gates, fences, natural barriers and replanting banks.

What about health risks? In 1999, the National Wildlife Health Center studied 12 sites in Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Virginia to determine if organisms that may cause human disease are present in goose feces. The federal researchers reported:

Low frequency of positive cultures indicate that risk to humans of disease through contact with Canada geese feces appeared to be minimal at the four sites in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia during the summer and early fall of 1999.

In May 2005, Kathryn Converse, lead author of the study, told The Greenwich Time that health claims are unfounded: “My feeling is if they want to remove the geese, they should be upfront, honest with why they don’t want them there. I personally have never seen an article through a medical journal or the Centers for Disease Control that linked an episode of human health to Canada geese.”

If appropriate, landscape restoration is essential; education fostering respect and appreciation for native wildlife is equally so. Both begin to reconcile society’s stated ecological concerns with our actions, particularly in our own back yard. Most people already live peaceably with Canada geese.

A true ecological ethic transcends farming wildlife for commercial gunning, and means more than the self-interest of purchasing green cleaning products. This is especially true on the heels of deer and goose management debacles, for which deer and geese pay the highest price.

Facts, not ignorance, should contribute to a wider understanding and a fully informed response to wildlife buffeted by both management and sprawl.

Susan Russell, Little Silver, was a lobbyist for New Jersey’s laws banning steel-jaw traps and the importation of wild, exotic birds for the pet trade.

Go on to Contraception For Wild Animals? YES!
Back to 2006 Fall Issue
Back to C.A.S.H. Courier Article Archive

 
 

Home  |  About  |  Campaigns  |  Crisis Center  |  Activists  |  Media  |  Hunting Accidents  |  Newsletter

C.A.S.H.
PO Box 562 New Paltz, NY 12561
Phone 845-256-1400 Fax 845-818-3622
E-mail: cash@cashwildwatch.org
Anne Muller - President

 

C.A.S.H. is a committee of Wildlife Watch, Inc.
a 501(c)3 Not-for-Profit Corporation.
Contributions are tax-deductible.

All content copyright C.A.S.H. unless otherwise noted.

We welcome your comments
   

Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org

Sponsored & Maintained by The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation