Selected Articles from our
newsletter
The C.A.S.H. Courier
ARTICLE from the Fall 2010 Issue
Walmart’s Barbaric “Pest Control” Methods
As Reported to C.A.S.H. by a former Walmart Pest Control Service
By E.M. Fay.
With their enormously high ceilings and large, frequently-opening doors,
supermarkets and “big box” stores are often accidentally entered by wild
birds, who then become trapped inside. Naturally frightened by the multitude
of people, the near-constant activity, and unnatural terrain, they
instinctively hide or fly upwards where they can’t be reached, and seldom
make it back out through the doors unaided.
When we see a bird in a store, we may wonder how or if s/he ever gets out
again. If a manager is asked if there is a method to release birds, they
might say not to worry, that they will “take care of it.”
We spoke with a gentleman who for eight years was employed by Wal-Mart as
a certified pest control expert, and his experience with the corporate giant
was quite distressing. Joe (last name withheld for legal reasons), a trained
wildlife removal technician, said that Wal-Mart’s policy towards “pest”
animals grew progressively more inhumane over the years.
“They started out trying to do things the right way,” Joe said, “but things
changed. It’s gotten worse over time.”
Joe worked as a “wildlife vendor” for Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club from 1999
to 2007. His pest control company “harvested” (i. e., shot) birds and other
wildlife that came into the stores. When hired for his first job he didn’t
realize the extent of the task. Since then, Wal-Mart has changed some
removal policies and tried to keep them more secret, he stated.
In the early days, they tried using skylights to get the birds out. Joe
himself took preventive measures to keep birds out, such as installing
spikes on ledges near doors where pigeons might roost. Another technique was
filling gaps in walls with foam. There weren’t many specialists such as him
in those days; he often travelled across country on assignment. But as time
went on, more people got into the trade who were less qualified and not
knowledgeable about humane methods. In order to save money, Wal-Mart began
using these untrained persons and took more aggressive action.
“We used to inspect stores to see if there were any issues we could fix.”
Joe explained. “We reported building problems to corporate headquarters. We
had ways that didn’t require shooting or capturing the birds. But now they
don’t care how they do it. They push the vendors to get what they want as
cheaply as possible. Recently, I found out from a Wal-Mart corporate
employee that they are actually trying to find as many people as they can in
all regions of the US to kill the birds.”
Whereas experts such as himself sometimes cost Wal-Mart $3000 for a bird
removal operation, with uncertified workers, Joe told us, “Now, they can get
it for maybe $300, so lots of people are willing to do it.” Wal-Mart often
doesn’t bother to check if the worker has a license or wildlife training.
“They don’t care. They just say, show us your insurance, so they are not
liable,” he added.
Joe explained that the reason Wal-Mart and other stores can dispose of
birds so cruelly is that some common species – English sparrows, starlings,
and pigeons – are not federally protected. No permit is needed to kill such
non-native birds. This fact was confirmed by Mitch Hartley of the Northeast
Regional office of the US Fish & Wildlife Service. Mockingbirds, for
example, are supposed to be protected, but less fortunate species have no
government protection. Native birds are protected to a degree, but even they
may sometimes be lethally removed by permit. “There is a reporting
structure,” Hartley said. With permits, stores are allowed to kill a certain
number if there is no “biological impact of mortality.”
When a mockingbird was trapped in a Louisiana store, federal wildlife
investigators questioned Joe. “We were there for sparrows,” he explained. “A
lady working in the bakery had been feeding the mockingbird. It was scared
and went into hiding, and she thought we had shot it. I explained that we
did not kill it. Even so, the store manager did not care that it was a
federally protected bird.”
Joe described “mist nets,” which are very large, fine mesh. When used by
a trained professional, they can capture birds carefully for release.
However, Joe has known Wal-Mart to cut costs by having ordinary employees
spread out the nets carelessly, and not bother to check them regularly to
see if birds are caught in a way that might damage them.
Pellet rifles are also used currently. The staff is all cleared out and
crews come in and shoot the birds, then remove the bodies. This is usually
done without the knowledge of the general public, Joe stressed. Regarding
blame for the birds’ deaths, he said, “They pass the buck onto the company
hired to get rid of them.”
Joe said he found out that a Wal-Mart manager in Indiana asked his
assistant to shoot some feral cats there. “The public found out about it.
They both lost their jobs and Wal-Mart was fined.”
This is the kind of outcome Joe hopes will occur more often if the public
becomes educated about the inhumane treatment of animals due to Wal-Mart’s
policy. “Whether it’s birds, cats, insects, whatever, if you’re not educated
on the subject you won’t do it right.
There are humane ways to do anything. My biggest motive is to educate the
public about this.”
In fairness to Wal-Mart, we note that all food vendors get audited for
food safety and pest control, and if a store doesn’t pass inspection,
management can lose their jobs and the company is penalized. That said, Joe
pointed out, vis-à-vis animal removal, “They will do almost anything to save
their jobs and keep the audits going smoothly. I have seen first-hand the
efforts made by Wal-Mart on a corporate level and by the stores themselves
to eliminate wildlife by whatever means necessary.”
“Since the end of my time with Wal-Mart,” Joe concluded, “I have found
out that they have recruited more companies nationwide to eliminate this
problem of the birds. I also know of new rules and regulations they have
passed to keep their associates and the general public from knowing what’s
going on.”
Some grocery stores discourage nesting near their doors by placing
plaster owls or other predatory bird images nearby. As Joe says, there are
always more humane ways to tackle any problem. We at Wildlife Watch urge our
readers to call and write to their local Wal-Mart and other stores, as well
as corporate headquarters, and insist that they employ well-trained wildlife
professionals who use only harmless methods of removing wildlife from their
premises. Our wild birds deserve no less.
Go on to Next Article
Back to Fall 2010 Issue
Back to C.A.S.H. Courier Article Archive
|