The C.A.S.H. Courier Newsletter
Summer-Fall 2012 Issue
Note to C.A.S.H. from Herman Lenz about Hunter Harassment
From Herman Lenz, IA
On Page 12 of the C.A.S.H. Courier, Spring 2012 [Unconstitutional Hunter
Harassment Law], the citizens charged for "hunter harassment" should
take their cases before a jury. Judges are bound by "rules" and they want to
"enhance their own careers," but jurors have the right and duty to "put the
law and charges on trial as well as the defendant," and to give a verdict
correct with their own conscience, even if it means to vote ‘not guilty’
when they know the defendant is guilty anyway. Jurors are not there to
enhance their own careers.
The highest purpose of a jury is not to feed the defendant to the lions
to satisfy an over-zealous prosecution program (as a judge has to), but
rather, to ‘protect fellow citizens from tyrannical prosecutions.’ A juror
should be more than just an intimidated wimp. Cases are won during jury
selection, but prosecutors will dismiss anyone who seems to know his or her
constitutional rights, or has a mind of his or her own.
For more information on ‘Jurors’ Rights’ check into www.fija.org
Go on to
Indiana Coyote Rescue Center
Back to Summer-Fall 2012 Table of Contents
Back to C.A.S.H. Courier Article Archive
|
