Wisconsin Wildlife Federation wants charges refiled in Waupaca County deer killings
October 17, 2010
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation wants charges refiled in Waupaca County
deer killings Judges dismissed case after DNR filed citations against 3
APPLETON - A group representing outdoor sports participants has asked a
state appeals court to re-issue felony animal mistreatment charges against
three men charged with the "thrill kill" killings of deer.
The Wisconsin Wildlife Federation and attorney Michael J. Cain filed a
friend-of-the-court brief with the Madison-based Fourth District Court of
Appeals at the request of the three-judge panel. The appeals court is
handling the cases of Rory Kuenzi, 25, his brother Robby Kuenzi, 24, and
friend Nicholas Hermes, 23, on charges related to the January 2009 killings
of several deer in Waupaca County.
Waupaca County judges dismissed felony charges against the men after the
state Department of Natural Resources filed citations charging them with
several conservation violations.
The judges ruled the men cannot be prosecuted on both types of charges
for the same crime. They said if the men are cited by the DNR with violating
the state's hunting laws, which explicitly exempt hunters from animal
mistreatment charges, then the criminal animal mistreatment charges cannot
The state and attorneys for the men will be allowed to file responses to
the Wildlife Federation brief, the court has ordered.
No deadline has been set for a ruling by the court.
Cain said members of the federation, which represents more than 100,000
hunting, fishing and trapping sports participants in the state, did not
believe the men should be treated as hunters.
"The federation has found that virtually all hunters found the alleged
acts of the defendants in this matter appalling and their characterization
as 'acts of hunting' to be demeaning and inaccurate, he said.
"It is safe to say that Wisconsin sportsmen and women do not consider
such conduct to be forms of hunting."
While the definition of hunting is broad in state statutes, it does not
cover acts such as hitting a deer on a highway with a vehicle or chasing a
mourning dove at a bird feeder, Cain argued.
"The alleged acts of the defendants in this matter are relatively unique
and far distant from those actions that most citizens and arguably the
Legislature would consider 'hunting,'" he said.
Protection that keeps hunters from animal cruelty charges apply "only in
situations when they are in full compliance with the state hunting
The three defendants, he said, "hunted" the deer with snowmobiles, killed
them at night, did not have a license, failed to attach tags and failed to
register the deer.
Return to Hunting Accident Index
Fair Use Notice: This document may contain
copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized
by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit,
educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted
material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).
If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the