1. Activist Feedback
2. Book Review
3. Commentary on the Lectionary
1. Activist Feedback
Casey writes: I just wanted to let you know that on Wednesday I gave
out 600 CVA HGC booklets at Texas A+M in a couple hours of class
changes. Several of those who had gotten it earlier provided positive
feedback.
I found only a few in the trash, which I then reused. I think it went
over very well since it is a religious area and fairly new literature to
them.
Jeff writes: We had a great night of outreach in Phoenix, AZ at the
RAGE Music Festival. Bill, Jone, and I distributed 650 CVA brochures.
The crowd was mostly young and super friendly.
2. Book Review
Andrew Linzey. Why Animal Suffering Matters: Philosophy,
Theology, and Practical Ethics. New York: Oxford University
Press, 2009, 206 pp, $29.95 hardcover.
Andrew Linzey’s latest book, like his previous writings, is
thoughtful, articulate, tightly argued. Using logic and rational
argument, he demonstrates that humans do not have the right to cause
animal suffering. Linzey closely examines the justifications for harming
animals, and he finds that they generally involve claims of animals’
supposed “inferiority.” In particular, he notes that people have
asserted that animals are naturally slaves, that they are non-rational,
that they are linguistically deficient, that they are not moral agents,
that they lack souls, and that they are not devoid of the divine image.
Many of these claims about animals are dubious or false. And, to the
degree that they are true, both ethical theory and Judeo-Christian
tradition form foundations for arguments in favor of animal
protectionism, not in favor of animal abuse. Linzey then applies his
ethical framework to three contemporary activities that harm animals:
hunting with dogs, fur farming, and commercial sealing.
For many of us, protecting animals from human mistreatment is a
largely matter of the heart – compassion alone dictates that we should
show kindness and respect. Linzey shows that cold logic leads to the
very same conclusions.
Reviewed by Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
3. Commentary on the Lectionary
February 28: Luke 13:31-37
This passage includes Jesus declaring, “How often would I have
gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her
wings…” I have heard preachers remark that the hen is feminine image of
God, stressing the care and concern that people often associate with
mothers. What I rarely hear is people noting is what this metaphor says
about Jesus’ thinking about animals.
If Jesus thought that hens were mindless or acted on “instinct,” this
metaphor would be meaningless. Jesus must have recognized that hens
genuinely care about their young, because this is how he felt about
those who had fallen away from godly ways. Though perhaps not the main
point of the passage, Jesus’ using this metaphor demonstrates that Jesus
understood that animals have feelings and that they act in ethical ways.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.