Putting Glass Walls on Pennsylvania Slaughterhouses So We Can
See Behind Closed Doors
B.C. Natural Chicken
Address: 2609 U.S. Rt 22, Fredricksburg, PA 17026
Establishment No.: p493
USDA Inspection Report: 30 Dec 2010
Violation: 417.3(b)(1), 417.3(b)(2), 417.3(b)(3), 417.3(b)(4)
Citation: On reviewing the giblet chiller chlorine testing records from 12/16/2010 to 12/30/2010 as part of an unscheduled 03J01 procedure, SCSI and I noted multiple documentations of high chlorine water levels (above [redacted] ppm). On 12/22/2010, at 1218 hrs, the liver chiller water was recorded to be [redacted] ppm. The corrective actions taken were that maintenance was notified and product involved was retained for 24 hours. On 12/28/2010, at 528 hrs, the liver chiller water was recorded at [redacted] ppm. The corrective actions taken were that the chiller was stopped and a retest of water inside the chiller confirmed the high level. The evisceration department was told to stop pulling giblets and all product involved was retained for 24 hours. A retest at 539 hrs was acceptable at [redacted] ppm. On 12/28/2010, at 728 hrs, the liver chiller water was recorded as ppm. No corrective actions were recorded. At 941 hrs, the level was recorded at ppm. A retest of the water inside the chiller was recorded as [redacted]. The corrective actions taken were that the chiller was stopped and maintenance was notified. A retest at 1000 hrs was recorded as acceptable at [redacted] ppm. No product was retained. In all cases, the establishment shipped product considered adulterated due to the product's contact with levels of chlorine above those considered safe and suifable for use on meat and poultry products. Product exposed to chlorine in excess of [redacted] ppm is considered adulterated. The establishment addresses giblet chiller chlorine levels as a control point in their pre-requisite program to support why chlorine is a hazard unlilkely to occur. However, the program has not prevented the adulteration of product. The establishment failed to recognize the unforeseen hazard and did not follow the appropriate corrective actions including; 1. Segregation and holding all affected product, 2. Performing a review to assess the acceptability of the affected product for distribution, 3. Taking action with respect to the affected product to ensure that no product that is adulterated enters commerce, and 4. Performance of a reassessment of the HACCP plan. This is a violation of 9 CFR 417.3(b) (1-4).
417.3(b)(1) Segregate and hold the affected product, at least until the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section are met;
417.3(b)(2) Perform a review to determine the acceptability of the affected product for distribution;
417.3(b)(3) Take action, when necessary, with respect to the affected product to ensure that no product that is injurious to health or otherwise adulterated, as a result of the deviation, enters commerce;
417.3(b)(4) Perform or obtain reassessment by an individual trained in accordance with §417.7 of this part, to determine whether the newly identified deviation or other unforeseen hazard should be incorporated into the HACCP plan.