By Jim Van Alstine
Mid-Hudson Vegetarian Society members
and other friends from the region were there in great numbers this summer
at the Animal Rights 2004 National Conference in Vienna, Virginia. This
large annual forum for discussion and networking among animal rights
advocates drew several hundred participants. There were also dozens of
exhibitors and representatives of numerous national and regional animal
rights organizations.
The conference also inevitably draws
controversy. This year’s tiff was about the absence of many large AR
organizations, including the Humane Society of the United States, People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and Farm Sanctuary. Officially,
participants were left guessing about the motivations for the absences.
Alex Hershaft, conference chair and director of the host organization, the
Farm Animal Reform Movement stated, “Those wondering why a group they
support is not here this year should ask them directly.”
Unofficial reasons for the boycott
ranged from personal frustration with conference organizers to discomfort
with sharing forums with some of the more assertive activist groups, such
as Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, USA (SHAC) (Huntingdon is a research
facility that tests on dogs and other animals) and the Animal Liberation
Front (ALF). Even with the absence of several large organizations, the
exhibition room floor was full and attendance showed only a slight decline
over recent years.
In spite of, or perhaps because of
such deep divisions on the topic of appropriate tactics, the most charged,
focused and attended session of the conference was that which discussed
direct action and its impacts on the animal rights movement as a whole. A
Friday evening panel discussion, “Compassion into Action: How Aggressively
Should We Pursue Animal Liberation?” featured some of the top minds of the
movement. They discussed the impact of controversial tactics, including
open rescues from factory farming facilities, covert liberations,
vandalism of the mechanisms of animal abuse industries and intimidation of
individuals who are targeted as key participants in animal abuse
industries.
Panelists, listed here from
conservative to militant, were: Dr. Michael Greger, a leading expert on
mad cow disease and all health consequences of meat consumption; Karen
Dawn, writer and operator of the respected Dawn Watch list serve; Karen
Davis, of United Poultry Concerns; Steven Best, philosophy professor and
co-editor of Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation
of Animals; and Kevin Jonas, of SHAC. Jonas was recently charged as one of
the “SHAC 7” under the constitutionally dubious Animal Enterprise
Protection Act for posting information on web sites pertaining to SHAC
activities.
Greger, a relative conservative on the
issue of direct action, argued that liberations may save a few animals,
but others are brought in to take their places. Moreover, he says,
aggressive tactics turn public sympathies against animal rights advocates
and issues as a whole. Jonas and Best argued that direct action has always
been a part of social progress movements including abolition of human
slavery and women’s suffrage. They argued that a militant wing is
essential to position moderate forces, such as Humane Society of the
United States (HSUS), in a position from which progressive measures can be
leveraged. Jonas pointed out that while the media, animal abuser industry
representatives and some animal rights advocates object to SHAC tactics,
“none of the dogs liberated from the hell of Huntingdon complained. Each
of them was grateful.”
The plenary session provided a
sampling of the essays offered in Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, which
was by far the most purchased, carried and discussed book among conference
attendees. Although not a title recommended to anyone new to animal
rights, the book is a recommendable addition to the library of committed
animal advocates interested in the philosophical foundations of direct
action tactics. Those looking for a book appropriate for the new, or
could-be, animal advocate are better served by Tom Regan’s newest book,
Empty Cages. In a slim 200 pages, Regan lays out with simple elegance the
foundations for animal rights and the essential similarity and intrinsic
association between human rights and animal rights.
Two Mid-Hudson Vegetarian Society
members were among presenters at the conference. Peter Muller, of the
League of Humane Voters (LOHV), was on workshop panels, “Abuse of Animals
for Amusement” and “Enacting Protective Laws.” Joan Zacharias, vice
president of the Society, presented in the workshop “Engaging Public
Interest.” As an involved Sierra Club member, Zacharias has worked to move
that group toward improved awareness of animal welfare issues and the
environmental impacts of animal agribusiness. Her presentation reviewed
the Sierra Club’s spotty history on these topics, including its failure
to call for a vegetarian/vegan diet on environmental grounds and its
recent outreach to hunters through the NRA. Zacharias found reason for
improvements in the Sierra Club record as it is beginning a national
campaign for sustainable consumption that includes a focus on plant-based
diets. That campaign is being implemented in part due to the efforts of
pioneering vegetarian and animal advocates within the Sierra Club.
Society members Andy Glick, of the
Meat Free Zone campaign and Woodstock Animal Rights Movement, and Kathy
Stevens, director of Catskill Animal Sanctuary, each hosted tables on the
exhibition floor. Society members in attendance included Jenny Brown, who
is working to open the Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary, Doug Abel, Melanie
Carpenter, Cathy Palmer and others.