|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

|
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

 Articles and
Reports
Alternatives to Animal Research and Testing
Alternatives to Ascites Production of Monoclonal Antibodies
by John McArdle, Ph.D.
Alternatives Research and Development Foundation
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v8n3/8n3mcard.htm
Related Uses of Alternatives
Because in vivo production of monoclonal antibodies involves the
largest number of animals and the greatest degree of suffering, it has
received the most attention for the development of in vitro replacement
alternatives. There are, however, three additional aspects of the
process for which humane alternatives are appropriate and needed.
As mentioned above, the initial immunization procedures are most
commonly done in vivo, although in vitro techniques are available in
many cases. There is a need to further develop these in vitro options so
they can be applied to the broad range of MAb needs, not just the
production of human-specific antibodies.
Because of serious humane concerns related to its production, the use
of fetal calf serum and similar products with in vitro alternatives
(either for MAbs or in general) represents another candidate for
development of appropriate replacements. Whenever possible, hybridoma
cells should be conditioned to grow in serum-free media. This has the
additional advantages of reducing the overall expense and
post-production processing of the monoclonal antibodies. More than a
decade of experience in Europe suggests this type of switch can be
easily accomplished with little or no decrease in the production of MAbs.
All of the high yield alternatives described above are designed to work
effectively without the use of animal serum in their culture media.
Finally, there is a need in the production of hybridomas to replace
the use of animal cells with those derived from humans. This is already
a critical concern for MAbs produced for therapeutic applications, since
murine-derived antibodies are severely limited for effective use in
human recipients. For this reason, clinical uses of such antibodies
focus on those derived from human cells. To completely replace the use
of animals in all steps of MAb production, such concerns need to become
more generalized among all producers and consumers of monoclonal
antibodies.
Go on to
The Future Of MAb Production
Return to
Alternatives to Ascites Production
of Monoclonal Antibodies
Return to
Alternatives to Animal Research and Testing
Return to
Articles and Reports
Fair Use Notice: This document may contain
copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by
the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational
use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair
use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner
|
We welcome your comments
and questions

Our education and humane efforts include:
abuse, animal, animals, AWA, awa, Animal Welfare Act, animal welfare act, ape, apes, baboon, cat, cats, cruelty, dog, dogs, education, experiment, experiments, experimentation, exploitation,
freedom, guinea, humane, lab, labs, laboratory, laboratories, liberation, macaque, medical, mice, monkey, monkeys,
pig, pigs, primate, primates, rabbit, rabbits, rat, rats, research, researcher, researchers, right,
rights, SAEN, saen, squirrel, testing, vivisection, welfare
This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.
Since