Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

Stop Animal Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe out animal experimentation"

Articles and Reports

 The Animal Experimentation Scandal (2005 Updated Report):
An Audit of the Funding of Animal Experimentation By Seven Federal Agencies Listing the top Laboratories in Order of Funding Received During 2003
By Michael A. Budkie, A.H.T., Executive Director,
Stop Animal Exploitation NOW!

Introduction

Animal experimentation is an issue that raises controversy whenever it is discussed. It has been the center of controversy for decades. Animal rights activists have held hundreds of protests on this issue. The pro-experimentation lobby opposes any new regulation of the field.

However, one of the most controversial issues about animal experimentation is the direction in which it is going. No one seems to know if animal experimentation is increasing or decreasing. Are more animals being experimented on today than ten years ago, or are fewer animals imprisoned in laboratories? Definitive answers to these questions are difficult to obtain. Accuracy is difficult because reporting requirements do not currently cover many of the most commonly used species. Therefore, we are left with a very incomplete picture.

Reports issued by the USDA/APHIS (the government agency charged with enforcing the Animal Welfare Act) on an annual basis are difficult to assess. While they seem to indicate trends, these trends are often fraught with uncertainty. The exclusion of commonly used species (rats, mice, birds, amphibians, etc.) from the regulatory process is one concern. Additionally, there seems to be a constant problem with reporting. Many labs simply seem not to file the necessary forms in time for their statistics to be included in this report. In the six-year period between 1996 and 2001 there was not a single year when all facilities reported. With significant amounts of experimentation centered in certain large labs, non-reporting by even a few labs can substantially skew national totals. Additionally, major reporting inconsistencies have been uncovered regarding both the compilation process used by the USDA and the accuracy of the reports filed by major facilities. Therefore, it is highly likely that the USDA statistics often utilized as a basis for examinations of animal experimentation trends may be flawed beyond repair.

Where does that leave us? Unfortunately, nowhere. No other reports provide data which give a picture that is any better. Therefore we have undertaken a different method of assessing the direction of animal experimentation.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to assess every aspect of animal experimentation. Private labs are often not particularly forthcoming with information, and government agencies can take months to turn over documents.

The CRISP (Computer Retrieved Information on Scientific Projects) database catalogues every research project funded by seven different parts of the federal government via a grant, whether it involves animals or clinical research. Evaluation of this database provides a good indication of animal experimentation within these agencies and, by generalization, throughout the rest of the government. This can then potentially be generalized to represent animal experimentation as a whole.

Go on to Audit Scope and Methodology
Return to Articles and Reports

We welcome your comments and questions

Welfare (d-42)


This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.
Since date.gif (991 bytes)