|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

 |
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

Government Grants Promoting Cruelty to Animals
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
LEE E. MILLER -Primate Testing - 2006
|
Grant Number: 1R01NS053603-01
Project Title: Primate model of an intracortically controlled FES
prost
PI Information: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR LEE E. MILLER,
lm@northwestern.edu
Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant):
The goal of this project is to develop a primate model of an upper
extremity neuromuscular stimulation system controlled by means of
intra-cortical recording electrodes. Individuals with spinal cord injury
become paralyzed because they have lost the ability to activate their
muscles. These patients' muscles can still be made to contract if they
are activated by means of electrical stimuli applied directly to the
muscle or nerves. Likewise, the areas of the brain that normally control
movement are still active, but their connection to the muscles has been
lost as a result of the injury. Researchers at Case Western Reserve
University (CWRU) have demonstrated that implanted functional electrical
stimulation (FES) neuroprostheses can be used to restore grasp functions
to individuals with tetraplegia. Although remarkable, these systems are
limited to pre-programmed grasp patterns, and require considerable
conscious attention. A more natural control system, with more degrees of
freedom could provide greatly improved function. At Northwestern, we
have developed methods to predict the activity of arm and hand muscles
during grasping movements based on micro-electrode recordings from the
brain of a monkey. From a single, chronically implanted array of
electrodes, predictions can be made of the activity of shoulder, arm and
hand muscles. This type of electrode has yielded maintained recordings
for periods in excess of 3 years, and it has recently been approved for
experimental use in human patients. We believe that intra-cortical
recordings like these provide the potential for simultaneous control of
multiple degrees of freedom through natural thought processes. By
combining the strengths of the Northwestern and CWRU groups, we propose
to develop a brain-computer interface adequate for controlling a
neuroprosthesis. The development of a primate model of this
neuroprosthetic system would be a major step toward its implementation
in human patients. This application includes the following specific
aims: 1) We propose to use a 100-electrode array implanted in the
primary motor cortex of a mnkey to provide the input to a set of
decoders designed to produce real-time predictions of the activity of
particular hand muscles. 2) We propose to use the control algorithms
developed in aim 1 and an implanted FES prosthesis to restore grasp
following temporary muscle paralysis induced by a pharmacological nerve
block. 3) We propose to develop these control algorithms without the use
of initial EMG measurements, as would be necessary in order to implement
the system for a patient.
Thesaurus Terms:
biological model, computer human interaction, implant, model design
/development, neuromuscular stimulator, neuroregulation
brain electrical activity, limb movement, mathematical model,
microelectrode, motor cortex
Macaca, electromyography, medical implant science
Institution: NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 7TH
CHICAGO, IL 60611
Fiscal Year: 2006
Department: PHYSIOLOGY
Project Start: 01-JAN-2006
Project End: 31-DEC-2010
ICD: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE
IRG: ZRG1
J Neurophysiol (April 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00632.2002
Prediction of Muscle Activity by Populations of Sequentially Recorded
Primary Motor Cortex Neurons
M. M. Morrow and L. E. Miller
Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School and
Northwestern University Institute for Neuroscience, Chicago, Illinois
60611
Submitted on Submitted 5 August 2002; accepted in final form 21 November
2002
Task and data collection
These data were recorded from a single monkey (Macaca nemestrina) during
execution of a stereotypic precision grip task. The monkey was seated in
a standard primate chair with its right hand loosely restrained. The
left hand was used to reach toward a small Plexiglas device with a
13-mm-thick vertical bar instrumented with two force-sensitive
resistors. The bar could only be gripped by apposition of thumb and
index finger, which were inserted into 16-mm-wide slots parallel to the
bar. A single trial began with the left hand on a touch pad at waist
level. Following a 1-s touch pad hold time, an LED in the center of the
bar was illuminated, instructing the monkey to grip the device. After a
random hold time ranging from 500 to 1,500 ms, a tone indicated success
and the monkey was given a juice reward and could return its hand to the
touch pad to initiate the next trial following a random intertrial
interval. Figure 1 shows a series of three of these trials, including
several EMG signals, grip force, and several logical signals indicating
the state of the devices. The monkey typically operated the precision
grip device in alternate blocks with several other similar devices, each
requiring different use of the hand.
Surgery
Following training, a stainless-steel chamber was implanted above the
primary motor cortex, along with a halo-type head restraint. EMG leads
were implanted subcutaneously on 23 arm and hand muscles, with leads
routed to a connector implanted in the monkey's back (Miller et al. 1993
). All animal-related procedures were approved by the institutional
animal care and use committee at Northwestern University.
|
Please email: LEE E. MILLER,
lm@northwestern.edu to protest the inhumane use of animals in this
experiment. We would also love to know about your efforts with this
cause:
saen@saenonline.org
Return to Grants
Return to Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have
been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research
facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this
situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean
that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A
blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered
animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs,
sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90%
of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals
used at research facilities are not even counted.
|