|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

 |
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

Government Grants Promoting Cruelty to Animals
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
PETER H. SCHILLER - Primate Testing - 2006
|
Grant Number: 5R01EY014884-03
Project Title: The Role of Areas V1 and V2 in Target Selection
PI Information: PROFESSOR AND DIRECTOR PETER H. SCHILLER,
phschill@mit.edu
Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant):
This is a revised application that has taken into account the comments
of the referees who have evaluated the initial submission of the grant.
In a separate section, a point-by-point response is made to the
criticisms. The Preliminary Studies section has been expanded to include
a series of pilot experiments we had carried out the past six months
that deal with the central criticisms advanced by the referees and
provide evidence that the projects proposed are feasible and are likely
to lead to significant new understanding of the role areas V1 and V2
play in target selection with visually guided eye movements. This grant
application replaces EY00676 entitled Parallel information processing in
the visual system that we decided not to renew because the work under
that grant has been largely completed and because the new discoveries we
had made dictate a shift in our effort. The aim of the proposed research
is to determine what role areas V1 and V2 of the primate play in the
selection of visual targets with saccadic eye movements. Rhesus monkeys
will be trained on a variety of behavioral tasks to enable us to study
their visual capacities and their ability to select visual targets with
saccadic eye movements. Single-cell recordings, microstimulation, and
the application of GABAergic neurotransmitter agonists and antagonists
will be used to assess how areas V1 and V2 interact and how they
contribute to the generation of saccadic eye movements to visual
targets. The proposal is based on a recent set of findings from our
laboratory that has established that these two areas are centrally
involved in target selection with visually guided saccadic eye
movements. The work has shown that electrical stimulation of the
infragranular layers of V1 and V2 enhances the generation of saccadic
eye movements to visual targets at very low current levels whereas
stimulation of the supragranular layers interferes with target
selection. In addition to clarifying the role of V1 and V2 in the
generation of visually guided saccadic eye movements, the proposed
research should have significant bearing on microstimulation prosthetics
for the visually disadvantaged as it will specify the effects of
microstimulation of different layers of the visual cortex and what roles
various neurotransmitters play in the process.
Thesaurus Terms:
saccade, visual cortex
biofeedback, gamma aminobutyrate, neurotransmitter agonist,
neurotransmitter antagonist, superior colliculus, visual perception
Macaca mulatta, behavior test, electrostimulus
Institution: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
77 MASSACHUSETTS AVE
CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
Fiscal Year: 2006
Department: CENTER FOR CANCER RESEARCH
Project Start: 01-APR-2004
Project End: 31-MAR-2009
ICD: NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
IRG: CVP
Volume 16, Number 22, Issue of November 15, 1996 pp. 7376-7389
Copyright ©1996 Society for Neuroscience
Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex
Karl Zipser1, Victor A. F. Lamme2,
and Peter H. Schiller1
1 The Department of Brain and Cognitive
Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02139, and 2 Graduate
School of Neurosciences, Department of Medical Physics, AMC, University
of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and The Netherlands Ophthalmic
Research Institute, 1100 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experiments were performed on four male Macaca mulatta, each weighing
8-10 kg. Before surgery, monkeys were trained to jump into their primate
chairs and were habituated to the laboratory environment. Subsequently,
each animal underwent surgical procedures for implantation of a
stainless steel cranial post for fixing the position of the head. In the
same operation, we implanted the given animal with a scleral coil for
monitoring eye position. All surgical procedures were performed using
sterile techniques, with monkeys under deep pentobarbital anesthesia;
all experimental procedures were performed in accordance with National
Institutes of Health guidelines.
After recovery from surgery, monkeys were water-deprived and brought to
the laboratory for training. We used a PDP-11/37 computer to regulate
and monitor the monkey's behavioral tasks, to collect behavioral and
neurophysiological data, and to signal an IBM PC for control of visual
stimulation. With its head restrained in the primate chair facing a
computer graphics monitor, each monkey was trained to fixate a small
luminous spot on the screen and then to make a saccadic eye movement to
a luminous target stimulus that appeared in a random position when the
fixation spot was extinguished. Analog x and y eye position signals,
measured using the scleral coil (Robinson, 1963 ), were collected at 200
Hz and digitized with a precision of 0.01° of visual angle. For
maintaining fixation and then making the correct saccades, the monkey
was rewarded automatically with a drop of apple juice. During training
and recording, animals drank a total of 300-500 ml of juice (during 1500
or more trials) per session. Additional rewards of peanuts and fresh
fruit were provided once the animals returned to their home cages at the
end of the day.
|
Please email: PETER H. SCHILLER,
phschill@mit.edu to protest the inhumane use of animals in this
experiment. We would also love to know about your efforts with this
cause:
saen@saenonline.org
Return to Grants
Return to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have
been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research
facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this
situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean
that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A
blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered
animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs,
sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90%
of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals
used at research facilities are not even counted.
|