U.S. Army Medical Research, Frederick, MD
|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List


|
Stop Animal Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"


Resources and Links
Facility Reports and Information
U.S. Army Medical Research, Frederick, MD
DOD Funding of Animal Cruelty 2005:
M4: Medical Biological Defense - 4
Title: Immunology and Efficacy of Recombinant Protein Vaccines
andNovel Mucosal Adjuvants Delivered by Inhalation in Guinea Pigs.
Research Category: M4: Medical Biological Defense
FY: 2005 Funding (in dollars): $40,000
Responsible Organization: U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Primary Contact: MRMC: U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of
Infectious Diseases
City: Fort Detrick
State: MD
Zip: 21702-5011
Keywords: LABORATORY ANIMALS RPA
Objective:
The objective of the proposed experimental plan is to assess the
immunogenicity and efficacy of recombinant vaccines when delivered by
inhalation. An ancillary objective described in this plan is to assess
the adjuvanticity and relative safety of novel mucosal adjuvants.
Specific objectives follow. 1) Establish systemic and mucosal
immunogenicity of inhaled rPA with an appropriate adjuvant in guinea
pigs 2) Establish the efficacy of inhaled rPA with the appropriate
mucosal adjuvant in guinea pigs against lethal aerosol challenge using a
virulent strain of B. anthracis 3) Estab systemic and mucosal
immunogenicity of inhaled F1V with an appropriate adjuvant in guinea
pigs 4) Establish the efficacy of inhaled F1V with the appropriate
mucosal adjuvant in guinea pigs against lethal aerosol challenge using a
virulent strain of Y. pestis 5) Establish systemic and mucosal
immunogenicity of inhaled recombinant ricin vaccine with an appropriate
mucosal adjuvant in guinea pigs
Approach:
Vaccines have traditionally been administered by injection using a
needle and syringe. There are many advantages, both practical and
scientific, why alternative delivery of vaccines, specifically
inhalation, may work better than injection. One of the most important
considerations in vaccine administration 15 increasing the body's immune
response at the point of entry, which in the case of aerosolized
biowarfare agents, is the lung It has been shown in previous studies
that administration of vaccine by injection, while inducing serological
(bloodborne) antibodies, does not necessarily induce the type of
antibodies that coat the lining of the lungs or intestines. The
induction of these type of antibodies, called mucosal antibodies, are
very important in the body's first defense against infectious biological
agents that are delivered by inhalation. This animal protocol details
experiments that will test whether delivering a vaccine along with
compounds called adjuvants that act as a catalyst for the vaccine by
inhalation rather than injection, will lead to mucosal immunity in the
animals. Once the antibody response has been determined in the animals,
they will be exposed to a lethal amount of aerosolized agent to test
whether the vaccine will indeed protect the animals as well or better
than groups that have been vaccinated by injection.
________________________________________
Research was conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and
other Federal statutes and regulations relating to the use of animals in
research and was reviewed and approved by the Institute's Animal Care
and Use Committee.
|
Return to U.S. Army Medical Research, Frederick, MD
Return to Maryland
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs, sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90% of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals used at research facilities are not even counted.
|
We welcome your comments and questions

Our education and humane efforts include:
abuse, animal, animals, AWA, awa, Animal Welfare Act, animal welfare act, ape, apes, baboon, cat, cats, cruelty, dog, dogs, education, experiment, experiments, experimentation, exploitation,
freedom, guinea, humane, lab, labs, laboratory, laboratories, liberation, macaque, medical, mice, monkey, monkeys,
pig, pigs, primate, primates, rabbit, rabbits, rat, rats, research, researcher, researchers, right,
rights, SAEN, saen, squirrel, testing, vivisection, welfare (d-21)
This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting all-creatures.org.
Since