|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

 |
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

Government Grants Promoting Cruelty to Animals
Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC
LINDA J. PORRINO - Primate Testing - 2007
Grant Number: 5P50DA006634-160012
Project Title: FUNCTIONAL SUBSTRATES OF COCAINE
SELF-ADMINISTRATION
PI Information: PROFESSOR LINDA J. PORRINO,
lporrino@wfubmc.edu
Abstract: This abstract is not available..
Public Health Relevance: This Public Health Relevance is not available.
Thesaurus Terms: There are no thesaurus terms on file for this
project.
Institution: WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL CENTER BLVD
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27157
Fiscal Year: 2007
Department:
Project Start:
Project End:
ICD: NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE
IRG: ZDA1Systemic and Nasal Delivery of
Orexin-A (Hypocretin-1) Reduces the Effects of Sleep Deprivation on
Cognitive Performance in Nonhuman Primates
Sam A. Deadwyler,1
Linda Porrino,1 Jerome
M. Siegel,2 and Robert
E. Hampson1
1Department of Physiology
and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina 27157, and 2Department
of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los
Angeles, California Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles
Healthcare System/Sepulveda, North Hills, California 91343
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 26, 2007,
27(52):14239-14247
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
Grants DAAD19-02-1-0060 (Army Research Office) (S.A.D., L.P.) and BAA
04-12-F9034, National Institutes of Health Grants DA00119 and DA06634 (S.A.D.,
L.P.), DA09085 (L.P.), and NS14610 and MH64109 (J.M.S.)
Subjects.
Eight adult male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) weighing (8.0–11.0
kg) were used in this study. They were individually housed in stainless
steel cages in temperature and humidity controlled colony rooms with
lighting maintained on a 6:00 A.M/6:00 P.M. on/off schedule and fed a
diet of monkey chow supplemented by fresh fruit to maintain daily
monitored body weight. Fluid intake was restricted in time and amount
such that a prescribed volume of an animal's normal daily fluid intake
(80 ml/kg) was received either during the behavioral testing session, or
within 2 h of being returned to the home cage.
Behavioral Testing.
Each monkey was exposed to six different testing conditions [Normal
Vehicle, Alert orexin-A (i.v. and nasal), Sleep Deprivation, Sleep
Deprivation + orexin-A (i.v. or nasal)], which required 11–14 test
sessions for each of the eight monkeys. Animals were placed in a primate
chair 1.5 m in front of an LCD-front-projection screen for daily testing
on a multi-image visual delayed match-to-sample (DMS) task and performed
150–300 trials per session (Hampson et al., 2004; Porrino et al., 2005).
Animals were trained to move a cursor tracked by a fluorescent marker
attached to the back of the monkey's hand into the images by positioning
the hand within a two dimensional coordinate system on the chair
counter. Stimuli consisted of clip art images projected as 25 cm squares
within a 3 x 3 position matrix onto a 1.0 x 1.0 m display. All images
were unique to a particular trial during a session and no image was
exposed on more than on one trial per session. Responses to appropriate
stimuli were rewarded with diluted fruit juice delivered via a sipper
tube placed in front of the mouth. All animals were trained to a stable
baseline on the DMS task in which delay varied randomly from 1 to 90 s
on a given trial, and the number of non-match stimuli (images) varied
randomly from 1 to 7 in the Match phase of the task. As shown previously
performance accuracy varied directly with duration of delay and number
of non-match images (#images) presented in the Match phase (Hampson et
al., 2004; Porrino et al., 2005). Sets of stimulus images were routinely
changed every 2 weeks to maintain the trial-unique feature of each
session. Animals performed the task on consecutive days each week.
Sleep Deprivation Procedure.
Sleep deprivation consisted of 30–36 h of continuous sleep prevention
and wakefulness supervised continuously by laboratory personnel as
previously verified using EEG recordings of sleep architecture. On sleep
deprivation nights animals were maintained in a cage separate from their
home cage in a continuously lighted room and kept awake with videos,
music, occasional treats, gentle cage shaking, and interaction with
technicians (working in 3 h shifts) through the night, until the usual
daily testing time the next day. After testing animals were returned to
their home cage and allowed to sleep. In a previous investigation (Porrino
et al., 2005) evidence was provided that changes in brain imaging
correlates of local glucose utilization during the DMS task (see below)
were consistent with simultaneously recorded EEG changes produced by
30–36 h of sleep deprivation. Hence, replication of the same brain
imaging correlates of sleep deprivation in this study verified that each
animal was tested in the same sleep loss condition as reported
preciously. Intervals of 10 d, mandated by IACUC regulations, were
interspersed between sleep deprivation episodes for each animal. There
were no residual effects of the 30–36 h sleep deprivation regimen on
testing 24 h afterward at which time animals had returned to their
normal sleep patterns. |
Please email: LINDA J. PORRINO,
lporrino@wfubmc.edu to protest the inhumane use of animals in this
experiment. We would also love to know about your efforts with this
cause:
saen@saenonline.org
Return to Grants
Return to Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have
been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research
facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this
situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean
that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A
blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered
animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs,
sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90%
of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals
used at research facilities are not even counted.
|