|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

 |
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

Government Grants Promoting Cruelty to Animals
Rutgers State University, Piscataway, NJ
RALPH M. SIEGEL - Primate Testing - 2006
Grant Number: 5R03EY014657-03
Project Title: Neural circuitry of the parietal lobe
PI Information: RALPH M. SIEGEL,
axon@cortex.rutgers.edu
Abstract: (Revised Abstract) DESCRIPTION This pilot research
proposal is a conceptual break from a thirty year tradition
characterizing the properties of single neurons in the inferior parietal
lobule with increasingly complex behavioral tasks and analyses designed
to isolate particular cognitive functions. Recent optical imaging
studies have revealed the presence of multiple different topographic
maps across the cortical surface of the inferior parietal lobule. The
lowest resolution, and most robust is a representation of orbital gain
fields; optic flow appears to be represented within this much as
orientation is within retinotopy in V1. The proposal examines these two
functions in inferior parietal lobe from a novel perspective- the neural
circuit. There is simply no direct evidence in parietal cortex
explaining how its sensory and gain field neuronal properties are
generated. The molecular genetics of single neurons will be modified to
measure the activity of selected neurons and populations of neurons.
Standard microscopy will be used for population measures. Two-photon
scanning microscopy will be use to directly compare cellular morphology
and function. Specific neurons will be identified and studied over many
days to assess the stability of their properties. This concept and the
techniques for studying the circuitry is completely novel for
association cortex; the use of modified molecular genetics of neurons in
vivo in behaving animals has not been performed in any cortical area.
The impact of these studies will be to open up cortex beyond striate in
the behaving animal to circuit level analysis. In principle, the
resolution of imaging can be extended to the level of the sub-cellular
elements such as spines. In summary, this proposal is designed to
understand properties of inferior parietal lobule neurons in terms of
underlying neuronal circuits, much as investigators are now successfully
exploring the circuit details of orientation tuning and color in primary
visual cortex. Although the technical and conceptual issues are
difficult, the expertise assembled is appropriate to the task. The
successful outcome of these studies will be a substantial advance
permitting direct visualization of the sub-cellular, cellular and
circuit properties underlying the highest level cognitive functions such
as attention, memory, intention and plasticity in the inferior parietal
lobule.
Public Health Relevance:
This Public Health Relevance is not available.
Thesaurus Terms:
biological model, brain imaging /visualization /scanning, cell
morphology, ethology, neuroanatomy, neuron, parietal lobe /cortex,
sensory cortex, technology /technique development
Macaca mulatta, Sindbis virus, behavioral /social science research tag,
bioimaging /biomedical imaging, fluorescence microscopy, fluorescent dye
/probe, green fluorescent protein, laboratory rat, single cell analysis,
transfection /expression vector
Institution: RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK
249 UNIVERSITY AVE.
NEWARK, NJ 07102
Fiscal Year: 2006
Department: NONE
Project Start: 01-APR-2004
Project End: 28-FEB-2008
ICD: NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
IRG: ZEY1
Analysis of optic flow in the monkey
RM Siegel and HL Read
Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University,
Newark, NJ, USA.
Environmentally relevant stimuli were used to examine the selectivity
of area 7a neurons to optic flow using moving, flickering dots. Monkeys
performed a psychophysical task requiring them to detect changes in
translation, rotational and radially structured optic flow fields
consisting of collections of moving dots which are free of form cues.
The neurons in area 7a were selectively responsive to all the different
types of moving stimuli. Two types of tuning for motion selectivity were
found. Some neurons were tuned to distinguish a particular direction of
optic flow (e.g. radial expansion versus radial compression), while
others were tuned to distinguish between different classes of optic flow
(e.g. radial motion versus planar rotation). The latter tuning was
unlike that reported for area MST by others and may represent a novel
representation of optic flow. The response of these neurons to
translating bars was compared to that of optic flow fields. There
appeared to be no similarity in the tuning to the two types of motion.
Furthermore, there does not appear to be an identity between the neurons
that could be classified as opponent vector and those selective for
radial optic flow. Area 7a is involved in the further analysis of optic
flow beyond the cortical areas MT and MST and provides a novel
representation of motion. These results are consistent with the neurons
in area 7a utilizing motion for the construction of a spatial
representation of extra-personal space.
Read the full Article
(.PDF) |
Please email: RALPH M. SIEGEL,
axon@cortex.rutgers.edu to protest the inhumane use of animals in this
experiment. We would also love to know about your efforts with this
cause:
saen@saenonline.org
Return to Grants
Return to Rutgers State University, Piscataway, NJ
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have
been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research
facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this
situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean
that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A
blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered
animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs,
sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90%
of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals
used at research facilities are not even counted.
|