|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

 |
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

Government Grants Promoting Cruelty to Animals
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
NEERAJ J. GANDHI - Primate Testing - 2006
Grant Number: 5R01EY015485-03
Project Title: Neural Integration of Eye and Head Movements
PI Information: NEERAJ J. GANDHI,
neg8@pitt.edu
Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant):
The long-term objective of the research program is to understand the
neural integration of multiple motor systems. The oculomotor system has
long served as a model for the study of neural control of movement. In
the natural environment, however, an orienting response consists of
multiple oculomotor and skeletomotor actions combined to form a complex
yet coordinated movement. An integrated action ideal for scientific
investigation is a coordinated eye-head movement because it builds on
our advanced knowledge of the oculomotor system. The research also
offers diagnostic value for spatial orientation deficits resulting from
oculomotor, vestibular and cervical disorders. Recent experiments
suggest that familiar oculomotor structures, such as the superior
colliculus (SC) and pontomedullary reticular formation (PMRF), output a
motor command to displace the line of sight (gaze shift) by a desired
amplitude and direction. The gaze shift can be executed as a coordinated
eye-head movement, implying that the outputs of these oculomotor
structures also control premotor circuits that innervate the neck
muscles. An association between neural discharge and extraocular motor
neurons is demonstrated by recording activity during head-restrained
saccades. In contrast, a relationship between spikes and neck motor
neurons is only inferred by observing activity during coordinated
eye-head movements. A direct evaluation of the activity with head
movements has not been performed yet because, under ordinary
circumstances, the eye and head components of the coordinated movement
are temporally correlated. Hence, four specific aims are proposed to
characterize activity and identify neurons associated with head movement
control. Using behavioral tasks developed to temporally uncouple head
movements from saccadic eye movements, SC neurons will be recorded for
head movement related activity, both when no gaze shift is required
(Specific Aim 1) and when a gaze shift is planned or being executed
(Specific Aim 2). Similar manipulations will be employed to investigate
the distribution of PMRF neurons that encode eye-only, head-only and
coordinated eye-head movements (Specific Aim 3). Finally, anatomical
techniques will be used to determine whether SC neurons send divergent
axon collaterals or segregated projections to the eye and head control
regions of PMRF (Specific Aim 4).
Thesaurus Terms:
eye movement, head movement, neuron, neuroregulation, reticular
formation, superior colliculus
neurophysiology, saccade, vestibular apparatus, visual tracking
Macaca mulatta, behavior test, computer program /software,
electrostimulus, laser, training
Institution: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH
350 THACKERAY HALL
PITTSBURGH, PA 15260
Fiscal Year: 2006
Department: OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Project Start: 01-APR-2004
Project End: 31-MAR-2008
ICD: NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
IRG: CVP
J Neurophysiol 96: 2011-2024, 2006
Behavioral Evaluation of Movement Cancellation
Mark M. G. Walton1 and Neeraj J. Gandhi1,2,3,4
1Departments of Otolaryngology,
2Neuroscience, 3Bioengineering,
and 4Center for the Neural Basis of
Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Eye and Ear Institute, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
Submitted 15 December 2005; accepted in final form 23 May 2006
Surgical procedures
All experimental and surgical procedures were approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of
Pittsburgh and complied with the guidelines of the Public Health Service
Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Two rhesus monkeys
(Macacca mulatta) underwent sterile surgery under isoflurane anesthesia
for implantation of a Teflon-coated stainless steel coil for eye
movement measurements using the magnetic search coil technique and an
acrylic fixture on the skull to permit head restraint. These procedures
have been described in detail previously (Gandhi and Bonadonna 2005 ).
Behavioral tasks
During experiments, the animals sat in a primate chair in a dimly lit
room. Targets were presented on a light-emitting diode (LED) screen
located 70 cm away from the animal. The LEDs were spaced at 2° intervals
over a range of 96° horizontally and 80° vertically. Target presentation
and data acquisition were controlled by custom software written in
LabView RT (Bryant and Gandhi 2005 ). The vertical position of the
eyelid was recorded (in arbitrary units) by taping a 5-mm diameter coil
of Teflon-coated stainless steel wire to the outer surface of the lid.
Care was taken to ensure that the coil and tape were placed such that
they would not interfere with blinks or vision. The air-puff used to
evoke blinks was monitored by a flow meter that was placed 10 cm away
from the eye. Eye position, eyelid position, and air flow were sampled
at 1 kHz.
Monkeys were trained to perform randomly interleaved visually guided
target step and countermanding (or stop) saccade tasks for a liquid
reward. In the target-step task (Fig. 1A), the monkey first fixated a
red LED illuminated at the straight-ahead position.
|
Please email: NEERAJ J. GANDHI,
neg8@pitt.edu to protest the inhumane use of animals in this
experiment. We would also love to know about your efforts with this
cause:
saen@saenonline.org
Return to Grants
Return to University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have
been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research
facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this
situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean
that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A
blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered
animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs,
sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90%
of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals
used at research facilities are not even counted.
|