|
Home Page
About SAEN
Articles and Reports
Contact Us
Events and Campaigns
Fact Sheets
Financial Information
How You Can Help
Make a Donation, Please!
Media Coverage
Newsletters
Petitions
Picture Archive
Press Releases
Resources and Links
Grass Roots Org. List

 |
Stop Animal
Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
"Exposing the truth to wipe
out animal experimentation"

Government Grants Promoting Cruelty to Animals
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
JOSHUA I. GOLD - Primate Testing - 2006
Grant Number: 5R01EY015260-03
Project Title: Mechanisms of Learning a Visual Discrimination
PI Information: JOSHUA I. GOLD,
jigold@mail.med.upenn.edu
Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Performance on
visual tasks improves with training. Our long-term goal is to understand
the neural changes that give rise to this form of perceptual learning.
We use a task that requires a decision about the direction of weak
motion signals in a random-dot stimulus. With training, monkeys, like
humans, learn to interpret these motion signals more accurately and
quickly. We will identify the neural substrate of these performance
gains. In monkeys, several mechanisms contribute to decision formation.
Neurons in the middle temporal area (MT) represent the motion
information used to perform the task. When the decision is indicated
with an eye movement, oculomotor circuits appear to accumulate this
motion information over time to form the decision. Our three Specific
Aims will identify changes in these mechanisms as performance improves
with training. Aim 1 will identify changes in how the brain represents
the sensory stimulus. We will record from MT neurons to test whether
their sensitivity to motion changes as performance improves. Aim 2 will
identify changes in how the brain interprets motion information to form
the behavioral response. We will evoke saccadic eye movements with
electrical microstimulation of the frontal eye field. These evoked
saccades are sensitive to developing oculomotor commands and thus will
be used to test how the accumulation process represented in these
commands changes with training. Aim 3 will identify changes in how the
brain computes the decision. We will record from neurons in the lateral
intraparietal area that represent formation of the decision and
formation of the eye-movement response in a trained monkey. We will
determine how these different neural computations become linked over the
course of training. In the long term, these studies will help connect
systems-level electrophysiology with the study of plasticity and
learning. These connections will aid in the development of computational
tools to treat learning disabilities and clinical disorders (e.g.,
psychosis, dementia and agnosia) that affect the brain's ability to
process and interpret information.
Public Health Relevance: This Public Health Relevance is not
available.
Thesaurus Terms:
discrimination learning, neural information processing, neural
plasticity, neuropsychology, sensory discrimination, temporal lobe
/cortex, visual perception
electrophysiology, eye movement, motion perception, neural transmission,
neuroanatomy, parietal lobe /cortex, sensory cortex, visual stimulus,
visual threshold, visual tracking
Macaca mulatta, behavioral /social science research tag, electrode,
electrostimulus, magnetic resonance imaging
Institution: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
3451 Walnut Street
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104
Fiscal Year: 2006
Department: NEUROSCIENCE
Project Start: 01-AUG-2004
Project End: 30-JUN-2009
ICD: NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
IRG: CVP
Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a
sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area
Chi-Tat Law1 & Joshua I Gold1
Abstract :
This study aimed to identify neural mechanisms that underlie perceptual
learning in a visual-discrimination task. We trained two monkeys (Macaca
mulatta) to determine the direction of visual motion while we recorded
from their middle temporal area (MT), which in trained monkeys
represents motion information that is used to solve the task, and
lateral intraparietal area (LIP), which represents the transformation of
motion information into a saccadic choice. During training, improved
behavioral sensitivity to weak motion signals was accompanied by changes
in motion-driven responses of neurons in LIP, but not in MT. The time
course and magnitude of the changes in LIP correlated with the changes
in behavioral sensitivity throughout training. Thus, for this task,
perceptual learning does not appear to involve improvements in how
sensory information is represented in the brain, but rather how the
sensory representation is interpreted to form the decision that guides
behavior.
Read the full Article
(.PDF) |
Please email: JOSHUA I. GOLD,
jigold@mail.med.upenn.edu to protest the inhumane use of animals in this
experiment. We would also love to know about your efforts with this
cause:
saen@saenonline.org
Return to Grants
Return to University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Return to Facility Reports and Information
Return to Resources and Links
Rats, mice, birds, amphibians and other animals have
been excluded from coverage by the Animal Welfare Act. Therefore research
facility reports do not include these animals. As a result of this
situation, a blank report, or one with few animals listed, does not mean
that a facility has not performed experiments on non-reportable animals. A
blank form does mean that the facility in question has not used covered
animals (primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs,
sheep, goats, etc.). Rats and mice alone are believed to comprise over 90%
of the animals used in experimentation. Therefore the majority of animals
used at research facilities are not even counted.
|