Animals In Print
The On-Line Newsletter
April 17, 2012

| Newsletter Directory | Action Alerts | Poetry | Our Staff | Subscription Information | Links | Visitor Comments |

PETA finds cosmetic companies deceptive, secretly testing products on animals


PETA cosmetic testing   PETA cosmetic testing

Eagan Avenatti, LLP Announces $100 Million Fraud Lawsuit against Cosmetic Companies Estee Lauder,    Avon and Mary Kay over False and Misleading Claims Relating to Animal Testing

Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:45am EST

Eagan Avenatti, LLP announced today the filing of a class action lawsuit against cosmetic companies Estee Lauder, Avon Products, and Mary Kay on behalf of American consumers deceived by the companies’ false and misleading representations relating to animal testing of their products. Beltran et al. v. Estee Lauder, et al., United States District Court – Central District of California, Case No. SA12-CV312 CJC (ANX).

The Class Action complaint alleges that Estee Lauder, Avon and Mary Kay purposely defrauded consumers by falsely claiming that their products were not tested on animals when, in reality, the companies knew full well that they had begun testing various cosmetic products on animals. The complaint further alleges that the companies deliberately misled the American public by claiming their products were “cruelty free” at the same time the companies undertook animal testing in order to sell their products in China and reap hundreds of millions of dollars in Chinese sales. The complaint seeks to certify a class of over 1,000,000 consumers and requests over $100,000,000 in punitive and compensatory damages.

On February 16, 2012, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) announced that Estee Lauder, Avon and Mary Kay had been removed from the organization’s “cruelty free” list of companies that do not test on animals after it was discovered that the companies were performing animal testing. PETA subsequently downgraded the companies and listed them on PETA’s list of companies that do conduct animal testing.

“While it may make economic sense for a company to pursue sales in China, those sales should not occur at the expense of fundamental principles,” stated co-counsel for the Plaintiffs Michael Avenatti of Eagan Avenatti, LLP. “Estee Lauder, Avon and Mary Kay should have been open and honest with the American public and told the truth – that sales and profits were more important to them than refusing to conduct animal testing.”

“This case is about being open and honest with consumers,” added co-counsel Filippo Marchino of The X-Law Group, P.C. “If you advertise that you are not conducting animal testing, then you shouldn’t be conducting animal testing – it’s that simple.”

About Eagan Avenatti, LLP

Michael J. Avenatti, Esq. is a founding partner of Eagan Avenatti, LLP, a firm of trial attorneys that specialize in litigating a variety of high profile legal disputes in courts throughout the United States. Avenatti and EA are consistently ranked among the best attorneys in America. The firm is based in Los Angeles, California.

About X-Law Group, P.C.

Filippo Marchino is a founding partner of The X-law Group, a firm that specializes in litigating class action lawsuits on behalf of consumers. The firm is based in Los Angeles, California.

Eagan Avenatti, LLP
Suzy Quinn
Director of Media Relations
Office: 949-706-7000
Cell: 310-465-9893
[email protected]

Subscription and copyright information

Go on to New Sled Dog Code of Practice Issued
Return to April 17, 2012
Return to Newsletter Directory

STAFF (Click on the link to see photos and bios)
Staff Editor and Contributor:
[email protected]
Staff Contributor and Advisor: [email protected]
Sled Dog Action Coalition:  [email protected]
Staff Contributor: [email protected]
Pawprints, Footprints & Animal Chatter: [email protected]

We welcome your comments: