It’s high time the media starts calling horseracing what it is: animal exploitation, animal cruelty, animal killing – not a whit different than its cousin, dogracing, which has been outright prohibited on moral grounds in 41 states.
We and our work were featured in a recent Journal News (USA Today
Network) piece on the killing at Belmont (53 dead horses last year)
and beyond. (The article is on the paper’s subscription-only page,
but here is a pdf: Belmont Article.) To clarify, when I say our work
I simply mean exposing the truth – reporting the facts. As is its
wont, when confronted with these facts the New York Racing
Association dissembles, distracts, deflects, and deceives. Like no
one else. The article opens:
“Last year was the first in the decade since 2010 that the death
toll topped 50 at the Elmont, Long Island, park, best known for
hosting the Belmont Stakes. And 2020’s total was seven more than the
number of horses that died at Belmont in 2019 – even though COVID-19
stopped racing for over two months last year.”
Racing down, killing up. So how did NYRA respond? Spokesman Patrick
McKenna: “This was an unprecedented interruption and we are still
analyzing the full scope of its impact, especially as it relates to
younger horses.” More horses were killed – because of covid. Now
that is really getting creative.
Later, whipping is broached. As the Gaming Commission considers
rules changes, McKenna makes clear NYRA will not support a ban,
saying: “Skilled and experienced riders do utilize the crop as a
primary mode of communication in training and competition, and any
new rule should acknowledge that reality in a way that protects
riders and preserves the integrity of the sport.”
The whip as “a primary mode of communication”? Why yes, but
certainly not in the way McKenna means. Not that this should be
necessary, but here is Dr. Rick Arthur, equine medical director of
the California Horse Racing Board and no one’s definition of
anti-racing, explaining how that “communication” works: “There are
those who argue that whipping doesn’t hurt horses, but that’s
nonsense, and we all know that. Whips are noxious stimuli; they
hurt, that’s why they’re used. Run fast or I’ll hit you again.”
Which, of course, is something only the ignorant or mendacious would
deny.
The News followed with an update Tuesday. Belmont, the paper
explains, actually killed more than what was originally reported, as
one horse was “temporarily left off” the Commission database. (This,
by the way, came from me, as I tipped the writer, Mark Lungariello,
that Blackjack appeared then disappeared back in October; told that
I had independently confirmed the death, he then pressed the
Commission.) And while this latest piece notes that “the number of
deaths at all three NYRA tracks combined also hit a 10-year high in
2020,” it still gives McKenna and NYRA the last (specious) word: “As
always, NYRA continuously evaluates all aspects of the operation to
ensure that we are providing the safest possible environment for
training and racing; [the health and welfare of the horses] stands
above all other considerations.”
Look, I get why the racing people say what they say. To paraphrase
an old legal adage, when the facts are bad – your (gambling)
business kills innocent animals as a matter of course – pound the
table and yell like hell (dissemble, distract, deceive). But I’ve
grown quite weary of the coverage racing receives. Because of our
work, the truth is there for all to see, yet the media – with a few
notable exceptions – continues to give this industry the benefit of
the doubt, allowing the slick and polished Patrick McKennas of the
racing world to, for the most part, control the narrative. Well,
enough. It’s high time the media starts calling horseracing what it
is: animal exploitation, animal cruelty, animal killing – not a whit
different than its cousin, dogracing, which has been outright
prohibited on moral grounds in 41 states. It is absolutely
bewildering to me how this is not crystal clear and, more to the
point, why it is not reported as such.