Government Concern Over Animal Mistreatment By Antibodies Producer
Stop Animal Exploitation NOW!
S. A. E. N.
Media Coverage
"Exposing the truth to wipe out animal experimentation"
Please contact the Director of the USDA’s Western Regional Office to insist that immediate serious action be taken against Santa Cruz Biotech. Dr. Robert Gibbens Director, Western Region USDA/APHIS/A Please sign our petition |
http://www.bioresearchonline.com/doc/government-concern-over-animal-mistreatment-by-antibodies-producer-0001
Government Concern Over Animal Mistreatment By Antibodies Producer
By Liisa Vexler, BioResearchOnline.com, February 20, 2014
One of the world's biggest supplier of antibodies is being taken to
court by the US Department of Agriculture for mistreating animals.
Antibodies are widely used by medical and cell biology researchers and
are generally purchased from dedicated suppliers such as Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, based in California.
Antibodies are proteins produced by live animals, so suppliers need to
keep large numbers of animals and comply with strict guidelines for
animal welfare. Over the past ten years, Santa Cruz Biotechnology has
been fined several thousand dollars for noncompliance with the Animal
Welfare Act. UDSA inspections of the company's facilities, housing
thousands of goats and rabbits, found that that animals were neglected,
the food supplied was not of the required standard, and that sick or
injured animals were not adequately cared for.
United Press International reported today that the USDA inspection
reports were studied by the group Stop Animal Exploitation Now! as soon
as they were published online. In 2011, the group's executive director,
Michael Budkie, told reporters about the repeated history of violations
and urged the USDA to act against the company. The USDA has now filed a
formal complaint against Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The company did not
respond in writing, so they will have to answer the allegations in court
next July.
Matt Scott, a research biologist from Stanford University, told
reporters from The New Yorker, “I don’t think what’s going on is widely
known in the scientific community. If it was more widely known, it would
have an impact. Biologists care about animals and the land, and don’t
want to take part in something where either of those is hurt."
See also:
Return to Media Coverage

