MeatPoultry.com
April 2010
As animal-welfare officials and plant operators with Cargill Meat
Solutions work to install video cameras and software components to
facilitate remote video auditing technology in their red-meat processing
plants in North America, they say plans to incorporate the technology in the
company’s four turkey operations later this year may pose some
species-specific challenges.
In a March 26 presentation at the American Meat Institute’s Animal Care &
Handling Conference Dr. Mike Siemens, Cargill’s director of animal welfare
and husbandry, shared some of the lessons the company has learned since
installing the hardware and software to allow for third-party, remote
auditing of its animal welfare practices. Looking forward, the lessons
reaped in implementing the system may not apply when the time comes to
install similar systems at its poultry operations.
“We’re very fortunate on the red-meat side because we have the A.M.I.
(Animal Handling) guidelines,” Mr. Siemens said. Applying the technology to
its turkey slaughtering operations will “a little more of an evolutionary
process,” he said, as there are poultry-specific guidelines to follow, but
the company doesn’t have as much experience in terms of camera placement and
what the auditing benchmarks should be. “Our turkey division will be later
in the year,” said Mr. Siemens, adding that minor hiccups in the
implementation shouldn’t come as a surprise.
In March of 2009, Cargill announced plans to incorporate the R.V.A. system
in the slaughtering areas of its 10 North America-based beef plants using a
Web-based system of software and remote auditing services from Mt. Kisco,
N.Y.-based Arrowsight, Inc. The company then plans to incorporate the
technology at its pork slaughtering plants, which Mr. Siemens says shouldn’t
require as much installation time.
"The pork division has had cameras in their facilities for a long time so
it’s more [a matter] of just connections,” he said. The installation at the
turkey operations, however, may require extra time, as “we are kind of
plowing newer ground on the turkey side,” said Mr. Siemens, adding the
company will consult with auditing and handling experts and possibly
customers to ensure the system exceeds their expectations. “That’s an
evolutionary process.”
In terms of R.O.I., Mr. Siemens said remote video auditing of Cargill’s
animal-welfare practices isn’t an investment that can be easily quantified,
rather it is an investment in its brand protection. The technology is more
like an insurance policy someone might have on their car in case of a wreck,
he said. But, “We don’t want to have to cash in this insurance policy. We
want to have this insurance policy to make sure we don’t have any wrecks,”
he said.
Read more at Animal Rights Articles
Read more at The Meat and Dairy Industries