The real story is: the abuse of animals in the food system is at the heart of this global debacle that is fast destroying our economy, killing a growing number of people and making hundreds of millions of people live in miserable isolation... To talk about a global pandemic without discussing its origins - in depth - is like holding a murder trial without ever mentioning the defendant. It's irresponsible. It's morally reprehensible. It's stupid.
Lying by omission is one way to define "fake news." By that definition,
virtually all the mainstream news you are watching is fake. The networks
essentially refuse to discuss the origins of the catastrophic coronavirus!
Sure, you may hear news hosts make oblique and passing references to "live
markets" as they urge you to hunker down in your homes and get out the
Purell. But, that - obviously - does not tell the full story. The real story
is: the abuse of animals in the food system is at the heart of this global
debacle that is fast destroying our economy, killing a growing number of
people and making hundreds of millions of people live in miserable
isolation! This is, indeed, mother nature's revenge. Not my phrase. That's
how an expert in zoonotic diseases described it.
I'm not always a fan of the New York Post. But, I must give them
props for telling it like it is in their investigative story about live meat
markets just like the one in Wuhan, China, where this pandemic began. Here
is their description of the average "live market," aka meat market.
"In stall after stall, a mix of live and dead animals, which run the gamut from the known (pig, ox, duck, chicken) to the rare or unknown due to the condition of the carcass — stare back at you. In the wet areas of the market — usually reserved for fish and sea creatures and where the ground is slick with water and often blood — the stink is worse. The animals that have not yet been dispatched by the butcher’s knife make desperate bids to escape by climbing on top of each other and flopping or jumping out of their containers (to no avail). At least in the wet areas, the animals don’t make a sound. The screams from mammals and fowl are unbearable and heartbreaking."
Thank you New York Post. My question is: why are we not hearing
similar, accurate descriptions from news anchors at the major networks? To
talk about a global pandemic without discussing its origins - in depth - is
like holding a murder trial without ever mentioning the defendant. It's
irresponsible. It's morally reprehensible. It's stupid.
Experts believe that the virus originated in bats in China, then spread to
other animals, animals whom people ate. Here's how NPR describes the
insidious process: "Patients who came down with disease at the end of
December all had connections to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan China.
The complex of stalls selling live fish, meat and wild animals is known in
the region as a 'wet market.' Researchers believe the new virus probably
mutated from a coronavirus common in animals and jumped over to humans in
the Wuhan bazaar."
OK, so props to NPR too. But, what about the more popular cable news
networks? Why aren't they dividing in deep and consistently connecting the
dots between this hideous virus and the killing of animals for food? One
answer may lie in what you see and hear in between the news segments. I'm
talking about the commercials. Watch them! They are overwhelming
advertisements for meat, dairy and pharmaceuticals. These happen to be the
very industries that would collapse if consumers starting thinking
realistically about the cruelty and bloodshed that goes into producing the
ribs, burgers, wings, eggs, milkshakes and bacon that they have been
conditioned to consume. Are American slaughterhouses much better than Asia's
live markets? There is still lots of blood, feces and body parts. No way
around that. Meat doesn't fall from the sky. The fact is: there is no nice
way to kill someone who doesn't want to die. Slaughter, by its very
definition, is a nasty, grotesque business.
So, the news media continues to dance around the primal issue at the heart
of this mind-boggling catastrophe, the likes of which we have never seen.
Now, it is time we ask ourselves: what is the cost of ignoring this
essential aspect of the coronavirus story? If we do not learn from this
monumental calamity, could we be bound to repeat it? Through our society's
willful ignorance, could we be setting the stage for something even
deadlier? It's not the first time a virus or disease linked to food animals
has wreaked havoc. Remember mad cow disease? Remember swine flu, which is
still ongoing in China, decimating millions of pigs before their body parts
can be gobbled down someone's throat? Remember the avian flu? The
philosopher George Santayana famously said, “Those who cannot remember the
past are condemned to repeat it.”
That wise philosopher also said, "All living souls welcome whatever they are
ready to cope with; all else they ignore..." Right now, we - as a culture -
are still ignoring the truth staring us in the face: the killing of animals
for food is having a devastating impact on our world. It's a leading cause
of human illness, meaning heart disease and cancer. It's a leading cause of
climate change, habitat destruction, wildlife extinction, water pollution
and water scarcity. It's a leading cause of human world hunger because
animals eat so much more than they produce as meat or dairy. Now, add to the
list, it is causing the most disruptive virus of our lifetimes.
When will the mainstream media have this conversation? Hopefully, before
it's too late.
Number of animals killed in the world by the fishing, meat, dairy and egg industries, since you opened this webpage.
0 marine animals
0 chickens
0 ducks
0 pigs
0 rabbits
0 turkeys
0 geese
0 sheep
0 goats
0 cows / calves
0 rodents
0 pigeons/other birds
0 buffaloes
0 dogs
0 cats
0 horses
0 donkeys and mules
0 camels / camelids