In response to the growing awareness of leather's massive impact on the climate, land, and animals themselves, the leather industry has begun to push what they call 'regenerative leather.'.
Promised as a climate solution that holistically considers nature,
it fails to live up to those lofty claims.
First up, what is ‘regenerative agriculture’?
While 'regenerative agriculture' as a whole lacks a broadly agreed
upon definition, the Climate Reality Project defines it as a “system
of farming principles and practices that seeks to rehabilitate and
enhance the entire ecosystem of the farm by placing a heavy premium
on soil health”.
Methods included in the regenerative agriculture movement include
the use of cover crops, reduced tillage, poly cropping and more.
Notably, these methods do not require the presence of animals. While
animal life is critical to healthy soils, native and sparse grazing
by wild animals being replaced by domesticated farmed animals bred
for profit does not benefit soil, land or biodiversity.
Why do people think we need a ‘regenerative’ solution to transform
leather supply chains?
The rearing of cattle for meat, dairy and leather can lead to soil
erosion, especially when land is 'overgrazed' and when cattle are
introduced to land that has not evolved to withstand the hard hooves
of these animals, as is the case in some major hide exporting
countries, such as Australia and the United States. Soil compaction
results in lessened drainage and water infiltration, harming the
health of soil.
...
Please read the ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE.