Declining Arctic Sea Ice: Has a "Tipping
Point" Been Passed?
CO2 Science, Volume 10, Number 40: 3 October 2007
Al Gore and James Hansen talk a lot about "tipping points"
in the various climate-change scenarios with which they attempt to
frighten the world's inhabitants into adopting their unsavory
prescriptions for planetary salvation. If these critical balance points
are passed, their rhetoric suggests that the earth would essentially
find itself rushing headlong down the roiling rapids of a climatic river
of no return, from which it would be next to impossible to extract
itself and avoid the most dire climatic consequences.
One such tipping point is related to the reduction of Arctic sea-ice
extent and thickness that began in the late 1980s, continued through the
1990s, and led to record or near-record low values of these parameters
over the first few years of the 21st century. In fact - but based almost
solely on climate model simulations - Lindsay and Zhang (2005) have
already suggested that "the late 1980s and early 1990s could be
considered a tipping point during which the ice-ocean system [of the
Arctic] began to enter a new era of thinning ice and increasing summer
open water because of positive feedbacks."
So, we must ask ourselves, Is the Arctic, as we know it, already
destined for destruction?
New light has recently been shed on the subject by Maslanik et al.
(2007), who note that observations of the late 1980s and early 1990s
"contributed to the conclusion that the AO [Arctic Oscillation] was
the most dominant atmospheric circulation regime affecting Arctic
climate." However, they report that since the mid-1990s, "the
AO index has been near neutral on average, yet reductions in ice extent
and other changes previously associated with the AO continue to
occur." Instead of following the lead of Lindsay and Zhang in
assuming a tipping point may have been reached, however, and that
current ice reductions may now be self-enhancing and possibly
unstoppable, they conduct a search for what they call "other, more
regional, sea level pressure patterns that contribute significantly to
interannual variability," using "ice motion data to calculate
an index summarizing ice transport direction within an area north of
Greenland and west to the Beaufort Sea, and compare this index to
atmospheric circulation patterns."
This new endeavor has revealed, in their words, that "the mismatch
between the AO index and loss of ice can be explained by the frequency
of three main sea level pressure (SLP) patterns that yield overall
variability in SLP, rather than the presence of a single, coherent
physical pattern of SLP reduction associated with the positive mode of
the AO." These three patterns, as they continue, "were in
phase during the peak AO period but their frequency has varied
differently since then, with two of the patterns continuing to
contribute to reduced ice cover in the western Arctic."
Consequently, they contend that "regional atmospheric circulation
remains a significant factor in recent reductions in ice cover,"
obviating the need for any invocation of a tipping point having been
passed in order to explain the continued loss of Arctic sea ice. In
addition, they note that "Polyakova et al. (2006) reach similar
conclusions regarding use of the North Atlantic Oscillation index to
describe conditions in the North Atlantic."
To be fair to Lindsay and Zhang, the two polar science researchers are
careful to say they "can only state the tipping point as a
hypothesis," since the results they present "are from model
simulations and as such need to be regarded with some caution."
Hence, they correctly conclude that "proof that the late 1980s were
a significant turning point for the [Arctic] ice-ocean system will only
come with further observations of the system."
Now if only Al Gore and James Hansen could be as appropriately
restrained in the statements they make about the subject!
Sherwood, Keith and Craig Idso
References
Lindsay, R.W. and Zhang, J. 2005. The thinning of Arctic sea ice,
1988-2003: Have we passed a tipping point? Journal of Climate 18:
4879-4894.
Maslanik, J., Drobot, S., Fowler, C., Emery, W. and Barry, R. 2007. On
the Arctic climate paradox and the continuing role of atmospheric
circulation in affecting sea ice conditions. Geophysical Research
Letters 34: 10.1029/2006GL028269.
Polyakova, E.I., et al. 2006. Changing relationship between the North
Atlantic Oscillation and key North Atlantic climate parameters.
Geophysical Research Letters 33: 10.1029/2005GL024573.
|