She concluded that given increasing evidence of a significant co-occurrence between animal cruelty and human violence, that deriving pleasure from killing or causing suffering to other sentient beings is predictive of low empathy levels in hunting behavior, that hunting can desensitize young children to the suffering of others.
The question is often asked as to whether there is a Link between
animal cruelty and violence against humans in the context of
hunting. Research in this area has been minimal, but a 2014 paper
written by Australian psychologist and Link author Eleonora Gullone
on this topic recently came to our attention.
Gullone described increasing awareness and anecdotal and empirical
evidence of The Link between violence against humans, animal
cruelty, criminal behaviors, and Eleonora Gullone welfare concerns
for children and their families, particularly intimidating domestic
violence. In asking where hunting fits in this co-occurrence
hypothesis, Gullone noted that animal cruelty can, in part, be
explained by compromised empathy development. “It is not
unreasonable to argue that killing animals in the form of hunting
for purely recreation purposes is a demonstration of compromised
empathy since deriving enjoyment from a behavior that causes
suffering and harm must be devoid of compassion.
“It is also likely that children’s witnessing of such behaviors by
their significant others is conveying a message that harming and
killing sentient beings for pure sport is acceptable. Following from
this, it is likely not a coincidence that hunting is performed
predominantly by males who, as a group, have also been consistently
demonstrated to have lower levels of empathy compared to females,”
she added.
She observed that the number of licensed hunters was on the decline
in both Australia and the U.S., despite increases in the number of
licensed gun owners. Hunters represent a clear minority of the
Australian adult population, she wrote, suggesting that shooters
themselves are aware of changing community attitudes and feel the
need to justify and protect their position.
Gullone noted that contrary to perceptions that hunting is a sport,
many animal activists and feminists consider hunting to be another
form of violence and male domination. Anecdotal data suggest that
there is a co-occurrence between domestic violence and hunting and
that that legal violence (e.g. hunting) can generalize or “spill
over” into illegal violence (e.g., domestic violence), she wrote.
“Related to this, it can be argued that the endorsement of hunting
through its legal status provides societal endorsement to engage in
acts of cruelty and violence. Such endorsement is likely to manifest
in a circular manner both by being acted upon by those with
compromised levels of empathy and by increasing individuals’ levels
of desensitization to others’ suffering through such legally
endorsed acts of cruelty,” she wrote, examining the phenomenon of
kangaroo shooting in Australia by both commercial and non-commercial
hunters and humane issues that surround the shootings despite rigid
regulations.
She concluded that given increasing evidence of a significant
co-occurrence between animal cruelty and human violence, that
deriving pleasure from killing or causing suffering to other
sentient beings is predictive of low empathy levels in hunting
behavior, that hunting can desensitize young children to the
suffering of others, and that only 5.2% of the adult Australian
population hold hunting licenses, it is fair to ask whether it is
still appropriate for hunting to be considered socially acceptable
behavior. “Are societies that legally endorse hunting as a source of
recreation unintentionally promoting ‘criminal’ behaviors through
the continued legal status of such activities?” she asked.
Learn more at: Gullone, E. (2014). Co-occurrence of
human violence, criminal behaviour and animal abuse: Implications
for legalized hunting behaviour. Monash University Department of
Psychology [unpublished paper].