Raptors were becoming collateral damage in the pesticide industry’s never-ending war against rodents. Never-ending may be the key phrase here. Because the rodent population has remained stable for decades despite the saturation of American streets and buildings with second generation rodenticides.
Red-tailed hawk in Portland neighborhood. Photo: Jeffrey St.
Clair.
It was a mystery. Why were so many birds dying in Berkeley? And not
just any birds, but some of the rarest birds in the urban landscape,
the birds at the top of the food chain: raptors. In 2007, Lisa
Owens-Viani was approached by a neighbor carrying a black garbage
bag. Inside were the bodies of two young Cooper’s Hawks. The
neighbor told Lisa that they’d found the birds that morning in a
plastic wading pool. The neighbor asked Owens-Viani if she could
identify the birds. Not only could Lisa identify them, she thought
she might even know them. They were likely to be a pair of Cooper’s
hawks that had been recently fledged from a nest she’d been
monitoring as part of her volunteer survey work for the Golden Gate
Raptor Observatory.
Why had raptors been in a children’s swimming pool? And why had they
died? Lisa had an idea, but she needed confirmation. She had the
bodies sent to an animal testing lab at UC Davis, where necropsies
confirmed her suspicions. They birds had been poisoned. Not by some
raptor-hating neighbor, but by rodenticides that had built up inside
the hawks’ food source: rats. The poison had likely dehydrated the
young hawks, attracting them to the small pool. Lisa began
investigating. She put up flyers across her neighborhood and soon
found more reports of dead raptors in Berkeley, including one
Cooper’s hawk that had bled out on a sidewalk in front of a child. A
necropsy later confirmed that its body had a high level of the
poison brodifacoum.
Raptors were becoming collateral damage in the pesticide industry’s
never-ending war against rodents. Never-ending may be the key phrase
here. Because the rodent population has remained stable for decades
despite the saturation of American streets and buildings with
“second generation rodenticides.” Any loss of an apex predator like
a Great Horned Owl, fox or Mountain Lion, is a blow to their small
numbers and a benefit to their prey species, including rats.
Rodenticides are indiscriminate killers, and can kill pets like your
dog or cat, wild predators and scavengers, as well as the rodents
you fear. As Lisa told me: “toxic rodent control methods are
eliminating the very species that provide natural pest control.”
Lisa’s challenge was extreme: how to get people to overcome their
innate loathing for one animal population to save another in a
habitat that defies every ingrained concept of what is “natural.” It
was not only anti-rat prejudice and fear she had to overcome, but
also a multi-national industry with deep pockets and long-standing
political connections.
So in 2011, she set up her own environmental organization. The name
of her group is elegant for its simplicity and straight-forwardness:
Raptors Are the Solution (RATS). According to Lisa, there’s been
some resistance, largely because of people’s deep-rooted phobia
toward rats, the same phobia that is exploited as part of the sales
pitch from the poison marketers. One of the first tasks for RATS was
to educate the public about a hidden environmental crisis that most
of them didn’t even realize had become a problem. “We needed to
inform the public on the dangers of rat and rodent poisons in the
food web and the dangers these toxins pose not only to wildlife but
to their own pets and children,” Lisa said.
Owens-Viani came up with creative advertising campaigns using
slogans like “Don’t Poison My Dinner” and “Rat Poisons Kill More
than Rats,” with photos of owls and hawks on billboards and busses.
Educating the public was one thing, confronting the pesticide
industry was another. As far back as 2008, the EPA had determined
that second-generation pesticides were a threat to wildlife species.
And not just raptors. Mountain lions, coyotes, bobcats and even
deep-forest species like fishers were vulnerable. Indeed, one study
showed that necropsies on a spectrum of wildlife species revealed
75% of them testing positive for rodenticides. EPA proposed a rule
strictly limiting the use of these poisons, but the livestock and
poultry industries objected and used their lobbying might to impede
the rule’s implementation.
But Lisa used the EPA findings to pressure cities to begin taking
action on their own. San Francisco was the first municipality to
urge local businesses to remove second generation pesticides from
their shelves. Then RATS led similar campaigns in the East Bay,
convincing the cities of Richmond, Albany and Berkeley to pass
similar resolutions. Eventually dozens of cities across California
followed suit. As a kind of reward, RATS came up with its Owl Wise
Leader award to highlight businesses, schools and government
institutions that had voluntarily stopped using rat poisons.
Still, Owens-Viani knew that voluntary compliance would only get her
so far, and that more decisive and comprehensive action was needed.
In this respect, RATS played a crucial role in the campaign that
compelled the state of California to remove all second-generation
rodenticides from most consumer shelves in 2014 and the EPA to
follow suit in 2015. But huge loopholes remained and the pesticide
industry was deft at exploiting them. In an effort to close these
lethal exceptions, RATS sued the state of California’s Department of
Pesticide Regulation demanding that the agency evaluate the
consequences of using both first and second-generation rat poisons
on non-target species. Before the court could rule, the DPR agreed
to conduct a new review of the second-generation poisons.
As the review dragged on, Owens-Viani and her colleagues pressed the
state legislature to take action, knowing they had an ally in the
governor’s mansion with Gavin Newsom. The governor had become
distressed by the reports of dead mountains lions in southern
California, whose bodies had tested positive for rat poison. The
campaign culminated in 2020 when the state legislature passed AB
1788, a bill puts a moratorium on the sale and use of SGARs until
DPR finishes its reevaluation. The enactment of this landmark bill
is one of the most consequential victories for wildlife in
California, and one of the most consequential blows to the poison
industry in decades.
Lisa is a realist. She knows the power of the industry she is
fighting and that more pressure needs to be applied to secure and
expand this hard-won victory. “This isn’t the end,” Lisa told me,
“but hopefully the beginning of the end of the rat poison industry.”