Animal Defenders of Westchester

lion baby

Home Page
Action Alerts
Event Photos
How Can I Help?
Press Releases
Rodeo and Hunting Fan Mail
ADOW's TV Show
Who We Are
Become a Member
Companion Animal Memorials

We advocate on all animal protection and exploitation issues, including experimentation, factory farming, rodeos, breeders and traveling animal acts.

Animal Defenders of Westchester
P.O. Box 205
Yonkers, NY 10704


Bull dies at Rodeo

Published in the SACRAMENTO BEE News, July 24, 2006:

Cal Expo officials call request to ban rodeo events unnecessary.
By Todd Milbourn -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:01 am PDT Monday, July 24, 2006 

The crowd of rodeo fans watched in dismay as the bull writhed in the dirt. The half-ton animal had broken his back chasing see-sawing cowboys during an event called "Cowboy Teeter-Totter."

"He was spitting stuff out of his mouth, rolling around, trying to get his legs to move," recalled Miles Young of Pleasant Hill, a retired state fish and game warden who attended the California State Fair that day in 2004. "The crowd saw the whole thing and went dead silent."

The announcer, Young recalled, continued as if everything was okay, saying over the loudspeaker that sometimes bulls pull a muscle.

But the bull wasn't OK. His back was broken. The bull was hauled off in a rodeo company ambulance. He was shot dead the next day at a ranch near Marysville.

Animal rights leaders say the case highlights the danger animals face at rodeos.

As the 153rd California State Fair gets ready to open next month at CalExpo, animal groups are pushing for an official ban of events such as elephant rides and the "Cowboy Teeter-Totter," which they say put animals at an unreasonable risk.

"Some of these practices are simply abusive," said Eric Mills of Action for Animals, an Oakland-based animal rights group that has spearheaded rodeo reform legislation in recent years. "This is not the CalExpo state fair this is the California State Fair -- you're supposed to be representing the citizens here. Citizens don't want to see animals harmed."

Fair organizers say such criticism is misplaced -- the fair didn't have elephant rides or the teeter-totter event in 2005 and there are no plans to have them this year. They say critics are focusing on an isolated incident to fuel a larger agenda: A ban on rodeos.

"Let's just say they're out of touch," said Norb Bartosik, president of the State Fair board of directors.

Bartosik said the fair takes great care to ensure animals are treated humanely. For instance, he said animals are kept in clean, well-maintained environments. A vet is present 24 hours.

"The fair is all about the promotion and education of agriculture and showcasing livestock," Bartosik said. "That's what we do and we think we do it very well."

In an era of strip malls, corporate jobs and interstates, rodeos are a link to California's cowboy past. California has 43 rodeos sanctioned by the sport's largest body, plus countless high school and college rodeos and charreadas, or Mexican rodeos. Rodeo events like bull-riding are often featured at county fairs.

Animal rights groups like Mills' say they aren't out to ban rodeos -- they simply want organizers to make sure animals are treated with care.

They've had some success.

Action for Animals was instrumental in getting a state law in 1994 that banned las manganas, a charreada tradition in which charros trip a horse by roping its front legs. A 2000 state law requires a veterinarian to be on site at all rodeos and to report any injuries to the state.

Mills' group is working with the Humane Society of the United States and Animal Switchboard, a San Francisco animal rights group, to put pressure on the fair. The coalition has received letters of support from two ex-officio members of the fair board: Senator Deborah Ortiz and Assemblyman Dave Jones.

It's hard to tell how dangerous rodeos are for animals because there hasn't been a major independent study.

Cindy Schonholtz, animal welfare coordinator for the Colorado Springs-based rodeo association, said the chance of a rodeo animal getting hurt during a particular performance is "less than five-hundreths of 1 percent." She bases that figure on a 2004 survey of rodeo companies.

The state has received 10 rodeo injury reports since 2002. But Gina Bayless, enforcement manager at the state veterinary medical board, said she suspects many injuries go unreported. She said the law is vague and many rodeo producers are unfamiliar with it.

"This is a problem," said Bayless. "I mean, ultimately this law was passed so we could compile statistics."

One of the most publicized cases was the death of a bull at the 2000 Grand National Rodeo at San Francisco's Cow Palace.

The bull hurtled into the metal base of a teeter-totter, snapped its neck, lost consciousness and had to be put down. The teeter-totter was the same one used at the fair in 2004.

Called the "Cowboy Teeter-Totter" or the "Bucking Bull Teeter- Totter," the contraption is featured by Marysville's Flying U Rodeo Company at rodeo productions throughout the state. It's basically a large, spinning metal apparatus that allows four cowboys to bounce up and down as a bull, taunted by a rodeo clown, gives charge.

Cotton Rosser, Flying U's longtime owner and a legend in rodeo circles, said he added padding to the teeter-totter after the Cow Palace incident, and that now it's as safe as any other rodeo event.

Rosser said most rodeo companies take extra precautions to make sure their bulls aren't harmed.

After all, it's in their best interest. Bulls are increasingly expensive, often worth $10,000 or more.

"You injure 'em, you pay for 'em," said Rosser, who has dealt with animal rights activists for decades and invited some of them to tour his Marysville ranch.

Mills said he believes Rosser has the animals' best interest at heart. Still, he maintains rodeo events like the teeter-totter are simply too dangerous and unfair for the animals.

"It's not a sport, it's an exercise in machismo and man's supremacy over beast," said Mills. "In a real sport, competitors choose to be there and are equally matched. That's not what this is."

Bartosik said he's miffed by Mills' demands, since the fair no longer uses Rosser's teeter-totter and hasn't had elephant rides for four years.

"Why would I recommend to the board of directors a ban of something that doesn't happen at the fair?" Bartosik asked. "There's no reason for it.

Mills, who is also seeking a resurrection of an animal welfare committee, among other things, sees it differently.

"The board could keel over and bring these events back," Mills said. "You need to have things in print for continuity".

Whatever the policy, Bartosik said, the fair is never going to be able to eliminate injuries entirely.

"It's unfortunate, but livestock have injuries that happen to them,"
Bartosik said.

"You could have a champion steer, it could step funny and bang up its heel. It may have to be put down for that. There's not really much you can do."

Young recalled that day at the fair in 2004.

He said the crowd of 300 or so was on hand, eating popcorn, drinking lemonade and enjoying the afternoon show when they heard a big thump.

Young said he was horrified to watch as the bull rolled around and the announcer tried to make light of the situation.

He became frustrated when he read the official report. The report, written by a veterinarian who was there, said the bull was injured from "normal animal behavior."

Young wondered how chasing cowboys around a teeter-totter was "normal animal behavior" so he sent a letter to Mills about what he saw.

Young said he's not especially interested in the fair's official policy. He just wants the fair to make sure that something like what he witnessed doesn't happen again.

After all, the fair is a great way to showcase animals

"Why should we patronize these guys if they're allowing this to go on?" asked Young, who hasn't been back to the fair since the incident.

"They've got to be able to do better."

Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Your comments and inquiries are welcome

This site is hosted and maintained by:
The Mary T. and Frank L. Hoffman Family Foundation
Thank you for visiting

Since date.gif (991 bytes)