Stephen Kaufman, M.D., Christian Vegetarian Association (CVA)
Are Animals Scapegoat Victims?
Many animal advocates regard animal exploitation and abuse as a
manifestation of human selfishness and greed. To the degree that people
acknowledge that harming animals is wrong but still endorse the practice,
animal protectionists have little hope. We can’t change hearts that are
already rock-hard. However, I think there is good reason to believe that
animal abuse largely derives from deep-seated hopes and fears, and if these
hopes and fears were addressed, humans would have significantly less
inclination to harm animals.
All of us want to believe that we are good, and for those who believe in God
there is a strong desire to believe that God thinks they are good.
Therefore, I doubt many people say to themselves, “I know animal abuse is
wrong and a crime against God, but I don’t care.” Instead, people tend to
seek justifications for their behavior, and that’s where scapegoating comes
in. Scapegoating involves the attribution of guilt (in this case the guilt
associated with contributing to animal abuse) onto others.
Sometimes those who speak up for animals are the scapegoats. They are
accused of being sentimental, irrational, or of loving animals more than
people. Christians often accuse Christian vegans and vegetarians of
distorting the Bible or even of heresy. In short, those who don’t like the
message often denounce the messenger. Often, they will claim that the
messenger is preachy or holier-than-thou, regardless of how respectfully the
message has been delivered.
More often, in my opinion, the animals themselves are scapegoats, as well as
victims of abuse. Next essay, I will explore how animals are falsely accused
of inferiority and immorality. I think this exploration will help identify
the deep-seated hopes and fears that contribute to humanity’s callousness
and cruelty toward animals.
Go on to: Nonhuman
Beings as Scapegoats
Return to:
Reflection on the Lectionary, Table of Contents