Stephen Kaufman, M.D., Christian Vegetarian Association (CVA)
Reflections on Genesis 3:16
This passage ends, “… he [Adam] shall rule over you.” Historically, this
has been an important basis for the subjugation of women, and many
Christians today still believe that women are obliged to yield to the
desires of their husbands. According to this view, a good, loving husband
still cares for the well-being of his wife, but his needs and desires remain
paramount.
This paternalistic worldview has been, thankfully in my view, largely
rejected. Most people accept women’s rights, in principle if not in policy.
Women may assume leadership roles inside and outside the home and refuse the
sexual entreaties of their husbands, and all of us recoil at the thought of
stoning women caught in adultery (though even in biblical times men were
generally given a pass for this “crime”).
The status of women has increased substantially since biblical times,
despite many biblical passages that undermine an egalitarian view of women.
Yet, when it comes to nonhuman beings, our culture’s attitudes largely
resemble those of the ancient Hebrews. We condemn gratuitous cruelty, but
whenever human and nonhuman interests collide, human concerns (however
trivial they might be) trump those of nonhumans. I strongly suspect that the
divergence between women’s rights and animals’ rights reflects the ability
of women to advocate on their own behalf, while nonhumans are much more
vulnerable to the cruel predations of humanity.
The great injustices associated with animal mistreatment anger many of us. I
plan to expand on that discussion in the next essays.
Go on to: Anger and
Values
Return to:
Reflections on the Lectionary, Table of Contents