Stephen Kaufman, M.D., Christian Vegetarian Association (CVA)
Advocating for Animals, part 3
I have been thinking about which is better for animals: promoting laws
and standards aimed at reducing animal mistreatment, or to exclusively
promoting abolition of animal abuse.
Frustrating my analysis is the difficulty in predicting the course of animal
protectionism. Is it possible that it can continue to spread to the point
that one day we will have a near-vegan world where people will oppose
enslavement of animals just as widely as people oppose human enslavement
today? Or, despite the best efforts of animal advocates, will the pendulum
swing back the other way, and the very modest recent gains be lost?
Whatever happens, I doubt that the strategies of animal protectionists will
have a big impact. Whether they advocate for ameliorating the conditions
under which animals are exploited or whether they advocate only for
abolition of animal exploitation, I think several other factors will likely
have much more impact on the scope of animal abuse. They include 1) the
relative cost of different foods; 2) notions about which plant and
animal-derived foods are healthy; 3) growing awareness of how animals are
treated (and undercover investigations of factory farms has been important);
and 4) the availability and palatability of “mock meats” and other
plant-based substitutes for animal products.
Abolitionists often assert that animal welfare concerns relate to how
animals are treated today, but a more important consideration is how animals
might be liberated from human tyranny. Next week, I will continue to reflect
whether welfare reforms undermine the goal of animal liberation.
Go on to: Advocating for Animals, part 4
Return to:
Reflections on the Lectionary, Table of Contents