Stephen Kaufman, M.D., Christian Vegetarian Association (CVA)
Free Will and Animal Issues, part 2
The question of free will is important for Christian theology. The notion of
salvation through faith suggests that we have the free will necessary to
choose what we believe. If we were unable to choose to believe or not
believe, then the term “salvation through faith” would be misleading. It
would be more accurate to attribute salvation to whatever force compels
belief. For example, John Calvin argued faith was a manifestation of
salvation, and salvation was predestined and ordained by God. Neither human
actions nor choices could influence whether one were saved. It is my
understanding that Calvin did not deny that humans have some degree of free
will, but he held that the force of human depravity overwhelmed any
possibility that we could earn salvation through good works and avoidance of
sin.
Still, many Christians hold that salvation is predicated on leading a
virtuous life, which appears to presume that humans have free will. While
there are differing views on the how much free will human beings have, many
Christians seem to be in much greater agreement on how much free will
nonhuman beings have – little or none. Yet, animals must make many choices,
and the notion that somehow these choices are “hard-wired” by “instinct”
makes no sense. In fact, we see that animals can communicate, learn, and
adapt. Both humans and nonhumans have certain ingrained behavioral
predilections, and it appears that both make choices based on experience.
Therefore, I see similar evidence for free will among human beings and
nonhuman beings. If one group has free will, it is reasonable to believe
that the other does as well. The source of free will appears to be the same
– the need to make choices among many options in a complex, ever-changing
world. Next week, I will reflect further on whether humans and nonhumans
have free will.
Go on to: Free Will and
Animal Issues, part 3
Return to:
Reflection on the Lectionary, Table of Contents