Greens Blog
May 2008
On the official blog of the Australian Greens Senators, Tim Norton
suggested that perhaps it would be more economically responsible for the
Australian Government to fund Sea Shepherd in its efforts to fight against
whaling, rather than its own customs vessel.
Sea Shepherd has been much more effective at intervening against Japan’s
illegal whaling in Australian Antarctic waters than the customs vessel
Oceanic Viking, which last year monitored Japanese whaling activity, but
stopped short of taking any legal action to prevent the Japanese from
whaling.
The blog is reprinted below from the GreensBlog - the official blog of the
Australian Greens Senators
----------
May 28, 2008
Still No Action on Whaling
By Tim Norton
Senate Estimates have shown the true lack of commitment from the Rudd
Government on the fight against whaling in our Antarctic waters.
Under questioning, it was confirmed that the 2008 budget held no funding for
a continuation of the customs ship Oceanic Viking (or any other ship) to
monitor Japanese whaling fleets in our Southern and Antarctic oceans, making
one wonder just what they are doing to do about whaling into the future.
Does this mean that the Government will not be undertaking monitoring of
Japanese whaling activity into the future?
Not that we can count on anything actually being done about it – after
monitoring the whaling operations, documenting the slaughter with pictures,
video and other media, the Australian Government have evidently decided to
file this away and wait for the Japanese to stop whaling on their own terms.
The Minister for Home Services has claimed success for the operation taken
out by the Oceanic Viking, when not one whale has been saved through their
operations to date. So far, the only ones who have had any success in
preventing whales from being killed in the Australian Antarctic whale
sanctuary have been the non-government organisations Greenpeace and Sea
Shepherd.
Meanwhile, the Greens continue to call on the Australian Government to close
the loophole in the IWC that allows the killing of whales under the name of
’scientific research’ and to pursue the international legal case to stop the
slaughter occurring in our Antarctic territorial waters.
The yearly migrations of humpback whales up the Australian coast are the
mainstay of the whale-watching industry, and losing the species could have
drastic effects on the tourism market on our southern coasts. Humpbacks were
hunted to the verge of extinction in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
century, with only 3 to 5% remaining when the IWC ban was enacted in 1963.
While populations off Australian waters have slowly begun to recover, the
population is only a fraction of their original abundance and they are still
listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act.
The Government hasn’t been prepared to take legal action to stop the whale
slaughter on environmental or humanitarian grounds and the Japanese have
continued to up the ante. First they procrastinate about acting on any
evidence they have collected, and now it appears they may have given up
entirely – therefore creating a farce out of the original expense incurred
by the Oceanic Viking mission.
Perhaps it would be more economically responsible for the Government to fund
Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd directly, rather than waste Customs time with
useless whale watching expeditions?
Return to Animal Rights Articles