RSPCA in Tasmania Serves Meat at Fundraiser and Defends It, Sparking Anger and Confusion
An Animal Rights Article from All-Creatures.org

FROM

Donny Moss, Their Turn
October 2014

The photo, posted by the RSCPA itself, has triggered backlash from supporters and activists around the world who argue that serving abused animals is inconsistent the organization’s stated mission.

RSPCA humane meat

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) in Tasmania, Australia, has triggered anger and confusion by serving sausages at a fundraiser and defending its decision to do so.

On its website, the RSPCA describes itself as “the voice for the animals of Australia” that “defends their dignity, fights to stop cruelty, and prosecutes those who would harm them.”

The photo, posted by the RSCPA itself, has triggered backlash from supporters and activists around the world who argue that serving abused animals is inconsistent the organization’s stated mission.

In response to the criticism, the RSPCA defended itself:

The RSPCA believes you can eat meat or eggs and still care about the welfare of the animals that provide it. These animals are living, feeling creatures, capable of experiencing fear, pain and distress.

The RSPCA believes all animals should be treated humanely, whether they’re animals we farm for food or live with as companions.

To make matters worse, the RSPCA acknowledged that it didn’t know the source of the animals who they served, which means that they most likely originated from a factory farm:

RSPCA humane meat

If the RSPCA, whose mission is protect animals, can’t connect the dots between the cruelty it opposes and the cruelty it supports, then how can the organization expect the general public to shift toward a cruelty-free lifestyle? Their decision to serve and condone the consumption of meat makes the RSPCA part of the problem, not the solution.

Return to Animal Rights Articles
Read more at The Meat and Dairy Industries