APE Animals, People and the Earth
January 2003
Animals like rats, gold fish and turtles heard good news when The Most Reverend Daniel E. Pilarczyk, Archbishop of Cincinnati, advised his clergy to encourage their parishioners to mirror the "compassion of Jesus". He said, "It is counterproductive to elicit support for our churches and schools by inflicting terror and pain on animals". In their campaign to stop church festivals from using live animals at gaming booths, animal rights activists were delighted when they were able to get the Archbishop to speak out on behalf of the animals. Such animal exploitation as rat roulette*, turtle races and ping pong gold fish, used to abound at Catholic parish summer festivals in Cincinnati until local animal advocates took on the task of getting the abuse stopped.
The remarkable statement by Archbishop Pilarczyk is groundbreaking news for the animals because very little has ever been done by the church in practice, preaching or teaching to help them. Thats why so many animal rights activists have turned off Christianity. And yet many Christian animal rights theorists are pointing out that Christianity has within it many themes that could be powerful for animal liberation. Besides, there is a large segment of the population that might be able to be won over if a true Christianity were to be made available to them. This has been the goal of the campaign to get live animals out of church festivals.
The campaign has been on going for a number of years. First, well in advance of the festival date, the animal advocates contact the parish pastor and festival committee chairperson and ask them not to have the animal event. If cancellation is not promised, a picket is announced and the media, informed. Everything is done in an above board, courteous manner with examples of all literature given to parish administrators. Needless to say, all protests are carried out in a legal way. Often a picket or the threat of a picket is sufficient to get the parish to cancel the animal act.
Most of the festival organizers had never given a thought to the animal acts they were using. The festivals are big business for the parishes and they are always looking for some way to add to the excitement. Animal games seemed like an easy way to "enhance" the festival. They were surprised when there were objections on the basis of cruelty. The festival organizers denied that any cruelty was involved. They claimed they took good care of the animals. The animal advocates constantly had to point out that the animals were not volunteers; that it was wrong to interfere in the life of the animals; that the animals were often hurt in their procurement, that the animals were hurt in the activity itself because, at the very least, they were terrified, and even though they did not cry out in pain, the animals were forced to do an activity not natural to them. The animals also were hurt when they were disposed of after they were no longer wanted by their exploiters.
To their credit none of the festival organizers wanted to be associated with causing pain to the animals. Getting them to realize that they were harming the animals was the biggest hurdle in getting the abuse stopped which is probably true in all cases of using animals in entertainment. Even when the bishop stepped in and announced that he did not think it appropriate " use or abuse" animals at the festivals, some of the parishes decided to continue the animal events because they claimed they did not abuse the animals.
The other big difficulty in getting the animal acts stopped was the criticism of triviality. Nearly everyone, even some animal rights people, thought that turtle races, etc, at parish festivals, were just too trivial to bother with compared to the animal abuse of the circus, rodeo, factory farm and so on. What had to be pointed out is that using live animals at the parish festival was abusing animals on the church grounds, the very place where compassion and respect for all sentient beings should be taught. It was giving religious approval to the exploitation of animals. Turtle races or rat roulette are like a miniature circus: the same kind of problems exist. Our literature asks: "What would Jesus say if he came to a parish festival and found people yelling and screaming at helpless little animals being used for entertainment and money making at a game booth?
Because there are so many parishes in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati it was difficult to deal with more than a few each season. Finally it was decided that some way was needed to speed up the process. Luckily, there are several Ohio laws that could be applied. First, it is against Ohio law to receive a wild animal without a permit. Second, it is against Ohio law to release a wild animal into the wild. These two laws could be used to stop the turtle races. Third, it is against Ohio tax law for a non-profit organization to employ some one to run a game booth. This meant that the paid "rat man" could not be used to run the rat roulette game. More than likely the parish could not run the rat game without such outside help.
We also asked the bishop to oppose the use of animals at the festivals. Very fortunately the bishop complied. That meant the campaign had what was needed to get the abuse stopped.
It is to be hoped that the campaign will be carried on in other dioceses. Other bishops might make statements, following Archbishop Pilarczyks statement, and other states probably have laws similar to those of Ohio that could help. The goal, though, is to get the games stopped on moral grounds. Going after animal abuse at such a grassroots level has made a lot of people think about the animals. It is a campaign that can be won and it is worth doing. Please note also, that there are many other festivals, like the fireman, the VFW, etc., etc. Moral persuasion can help here too. The law may also be available.
Return to
Animal Rights Articles
Read more at Animals: Tradition - Philosophy - Religion