Jason Hribal
2012
Capitalist enclosure over the modern historical period might have destroyed much of the commons and their culture, but the social relations engrained in them have persisted. Commoning between humans and other animals has been an ever-present fact and growing practice. Commoning can be found at its strongest in family, community, and class. This essay will consider the latter indepth.....Missing from those talks, however, is where and how other animals, in particular our fellow members of the working class, fit into this. Across the US, there are currently wild horses in Utah, wild cows in Georgia, wild macaques in Florida, wild sheep in Hawaii, wild burros in California, wild goats in Southern Illinois, and wild pigs in Pennsylvania. Yet these animals are not wild; they are autonomous.
Humans are in a constant search for commonalities between themselves and
other animals. This is often done in direct contradiction to the proverbs of
science and industry for which such thinking is anthropomorphic and
heretical. It is at a young age that the children of the United States are
taught repeatedly of these rules, as stipulated and standardized by the
educational curriculum. Humans are uniquely human; other animals are
something else—don’t draw commonalities. Yet never in recorded history are
more people doing the very opposite. From the popularity of animal rights to
the changing notion of the family, which is expanding to include dogs and
cats, the social relationships that define our lives seem to be speedily
evolving in this direction. Why? Capitalist enclosure over the modern
historical period might have destroyed much of the commons and their
culture, but the social relations engrained in them have persisted.
Commoning between humans and other animals has been an ever-present fact and
growing practice. Commoning can be found at its strongest in family,
community, and class. This essay will consider the latter indepth.
In its existing form, our conception of class is not adequate. It is much
broader and more complex than we have previously understood. Recognizing
this fact is a first step in moving forward with the development of new
ideas and approaches. There are difficulties ahead. We cannot, for instance,
have critical dialogues with other animals. We cannot organize politically
with them in the traditional sense. The relationship may not provide the
levels of reciprocity that we are used to. This is all true. But these
challenges can be overcome. Some individuals have already started the
process in earnest and in depth. Agnese Pignataro has called for a political
project between the species based on the ideas of class, empowerment, and
solidarity (2009). Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka have designs for an
engaged political citizenship with working animals (2012). Having these
conversations is not the same thing as ventriloquism. I have dealt with such
charges in the essay ‘Understanding Class and Species’ (Hribal 2011). Nor is
it the same thing as paternalism. Rather, by placing other animals squarely
into our larger discussions, as fellow workers who produce, resist, and
actively shape the world, we are including them in the future. This is a
question of solidarity.
There are important ongoing discussions occurring across the globe about the
future of the commons. Missing from those talks, however, is where and how
other animals, in particular our fellow members of the working class, fit
into this. Across the US, there are currently wild horses in Utah, wild cows
in Georgia, wild macaques in Florida, wild sheep in Hawaii, wild burros in
California, wild goats in Southern Illinois, and wild pigs in Pennsylvania.
Yet these animals are not wild; they are autonomous. These are maroon
communities. The term ‘maroon’ comes from the Spanish cimarrones, referring
to escaped cattle. It would come to be applied to escaped slaves but that
was, again, later. Some of these maroon communities are old, stretching back
decades to centuries; some are young and their culture is just forming.
These once domesticated creatures have found a way to survive and persist on
a commons of their own making. These commons represent a viable alternative
to the present, an alternative of animals’ own choosing, direction, and
purpose. This is not just a theory; it is practice. And it will be occupying
my work for the next several decades. Others are welcome to join me. Animals
have had a long, deep understanding of the commons. We should be learning
from them and figuring out how we fit into the future together.
Read the 37-page article - PDF
Return to Animal Rights Articles