Scarface: In the end, the end was a bullet
An Animal Rights Article from


Kathleen Stachowski,
May 2016

My message to trophy hunters who want to kill this sacred being on our sacred lands is this: go home. It’s crazy to have these rich white people coming here to kill, kill, kill and to brag about killing a grizzly bear. Human beings are crazy. There has got to be a change in our hearts.

A bullet stopped Scarface. The famously recognizable grizzly bear with a fan base in Yellowstone was a 25-year-old elder in declining health. Given that fewer than five percent of male bears born in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem survive to age 25, he’d already beaten monumental odds. That is, until he met up with a hunter’s bullet last November north of Gardiner, MT–Yellowstone’s northern gate–and a stone’s throw from the national park.

Scarface was robbed of a natural death on his own terms–robbed of the where and the when he would have lain down for the last time. It isn’t hard to imagine that it would have been within the relatively safe boundaries of Yellowstone, the home where he spent most of his long, bear’s life.

So the bear known to wildlife lovers as Scarface and to researchers as No. 211 is dead. And because grizzlies are still listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is investigating with assistance from Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP). “I don’t know if it was self-defense or mistaken identity,” said a spokesman for FWP. “The USFWS is leading the investigation and until that is done they are not releasing the name of the hunter.” And though the bear was killed last November, news of his death was released only recently “as a courtesy to the public,” according to FWP–in part because social media posters were mistakenly reporting that they had already seen Scarface this spring. And it would have appeared unseemly to wait until the public comment period on delisting had ended (May 10th).

As USFWS weighs its delisting proposal for the Yellowstone-area grizzlies, claiming they’ve adequately recovered, it’s no secret that hunters are salivating for a trophy hunt. An immense billboard recently was erected in Cody, WY urging state management for both grizzlies and wolves. (State management–i.e., hunting–for wolves already occurs in Montana and Idaho.

grizzly bear hunt

Wyoming’s wolves were returned to protected status in 2014 by a federal judge who rejected the state’s egregious management plan.) “The greatest trophy in the Lower 48 is a male grizzly,” said the owner of Gunrunner Firearms & Pawn, who bankrolled the billboard. “Now you won’t have to go to Alaska to get a grizzly.”

An elder speaks…

“The grizzly bear is very sacred to us. …As Native people we have faith in the animal world. Grizzlies are very powerful.” Johnny Arlee is a traditional leader of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation in Montana and a highly-respected elder. He continues:

Grizzly bears were here before the human beings and we respect them that way. We don’t play with them. It is an honor to have a grizzly bear name. It is powerful, and you have to earn that name. This idea of trophy hunting grizzly bears is really dumb. It’s the complete opposite of our culture. If it was turned around the other way and the trophy hunters were hunted, there would be a different thought.
~Native News Online

Yes, there would be a different thought, indeed. Just one week ago, Doug Peacock (author of Grizzly Years: In Search of the American Wilderness) sent a letter to Pres. Obama objecting to the delisting proposal, noting that USFWS discounted climate change as a factor in the bears’ survival now and in the future, and asking “(a) critical question: Who benefits from delisting Yellowstone’s grizzly bears? The only certain outcome of delisting bears will be trophy hunts in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.” Jane Goodall and E.O. Wilson are among the concerned scientists who signed on to the letter, as well as a list of notable citizens who live in the Yellowstone ecosystem–authors, actors, philanthropists, and one former Yellowstone superintendent.

And just a few hours ago our local paper, The Missoulian, posted an article online outlining the specifics of a possible trophy hunt in Montana. Both autumn and spring hunts are part of the state’s plan, with “safeguards” to minimize the killing of mothers with cubs during the spring. What is going on here?!?

Human-conflict mortalities claimed a record 59 bears (four orphans went to zoos) in the Yellowstone ecosystem in 2015–hunters who couldn’t tell a griz from a black bear, hunters who felt threatened, livestock conflicts, all the ways bears find trouble when their habitat shrinks, the tables turn, and they’re considered the intruders.

Scarface, and Blaze before him–and her cubs (see “A human-bear tragedy in Yellowstone“)–and the many nameless bears before and after them are too many dead bears without the added body count that delisting will bring. Delisting must not go forward…but will the wisdom of the elders be heeded? Doug Peacock: “We strongly suspect that America’s great bears face a dire future, even with the continued protection of the Endangered Species Act.” Jane Goodall: “Their future isn’t secure yet, because they face so many threats to their survival.” Johnny Arlee:

My message to trophy hunters who want to kill this sacred being on our sacred lands is this: go home. It’s crazy to have these rich white people coming here to kill, kill, kill and to brag about killing a grizzly bear. Human beings are crazy. There has got to be a change in our hearts. 

Return to Animal Rights Articles