Faunalytics
February 2018
One would think that with over 19 billion chickens worldwide – the most abundant of all domesticated animals – some effort would be made to understand these beings. Yet, unlike many other birds, chickens are “categorized as a commodity, devoid of authenticity as a real animal with an evolutionary history and phylogenetic context.”
Photo by Flickr user musmire
By Lori Marino
Despite the fact that some birds are known to be on par with many
mammals in terms of intelligence, emotional sophistication, and social
interaction, the general societal view of chickens has essentially remained
unchallenged by this new evidence. One would think that with over 19 billion
chickens worldwide – the most abundant of all domesticated animals – some
effort would be made to understand these beings. Yet, unlike many other
birds, chickens are “categorized as a commodity, devoid of authenticity as a
real animal with an evolutionary history and phylogenetic context.” Driven
by a lack of knowledge, chickens are often mislabelled as lacking many
advanced psychological characteristics and hence are typically thought of as
animals of low intelligence compared to others.
Lori Marino, a neuroscientist and scholar in the fields of animal
intelligence and behavior, set out to examine the available peer-reviewed
scientific data on the cognition, emotions, personality and sociality in
chickens. Through comparison with other birds and vertebrates, the
researcher intended to bring our knowledge on chickens up to speed and
highlight areas in need of future research.
Underestimation of chicken capabilities among researchers reflects and contributes to the ongoing public-wide disconnect between chickens as commodities and their individuality. What makes studying chickens particularly special is that, despite their long time domestication, the behavior of chickens is observed to be hardly any different from their wild counterparts. The researchers argues that this is due to the fact that, unlike dogs – the descendants of wolves chosen on their suitability as companions – chickens instead were selected on the basis of physical characteristics such as growth rate and fertility amongst others. Arguably, their brains remained the same as they were not challenged selectively.
Read MORE at Thinking Like A Chicken: Domestic Chicken Ethology
Return to Animal Rights Articles