Karen Davis, PhD, President,
United Poultry Concerns
(UPC)
February 2017
My tribute to philosopher Tom Regan, who wrote The Case For Animal Rights, and who died on February 17, 2017 after a battle with Parkinson’s Disease, is a slightly expanded version of the Comment I posted yesterday morning to Merritt Clifton’s beautifully composed obituary for Tom in Animals 24-7 which you can read here: Tom Regan, 78, made the case for animal rights.
“They say we’re EXTREMISTS for caring about animals! I AM an EXTREMIST. I am
EXTREMELY against animal abuse, and I am against it All the Time!”
Thank you Merritt Clifton for your informative tribute to animal rights
philosopher Tom Regan, whom I met in the early 1980s right around the time
that his book The Case For Animal Rights was published in 1983. Since that
book was more academic than Peter Singer’s Animal Liberation, published in
1975, was, it probably was more dipped into by activists than read cover to
cover. But Regan transcended Singer by arguing that nonhuman animals have
not only “interests” but RIGHTS and INHERENT VALUE. Sentient beings, in his
famous phrase, are Subjects-of-a-Life in the sense that “their experiential
life fares well or ill for them, logically independently of their utility
for others and logically independently of their being the object of anyone
else’s interests.”
Accordingly, he wrote that nonhuman animals “have a distinctive kind of
value – inherent value – and are not to be viewed or treated as mere
receptacles,” a point he stressed at length in The Case For Animal
Rights and throughout his career.
In later years, Regan criticized Singer’s acquiescence in scientific
experiments on nonhuman animals if the experiments were claimed by the
experimenters to have a potential to save more HUMAN lives or to mitigate
more HUMAN diseases. Regan challenged the media’s reflexive reference to
Singer as the “father of animal rights” which, he said in a discussion about
making monkeys suffer for human benefit, is not so. He wrote: “The Peter
Singer interviewed on the BBC2 program does not believe that nonhuman
animals have basic moral rights. As early as 1978, three years after the
publication of Animal Liberation, he explicitly disavowed this belief.”
(Read
Tom Regan Replies to Peter Singer.)
Tom Regan in his work following The Case For Animal Rights evinced
a lyrical gift, writing expressively and movingly about animals and about
his own early life in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and his evolution from being
an avid boyhood fisherman and meat eater to becoming a passionate vegan
advocate for animals and animal rights.
A True Pioneer
Tom Regan is a true pioneer of the Animal Rights Movement. He laid
philosophical groundwork even for those who may not now know him as well as
they should and, I hope, will. Regan had an emotional and artistic
sensibility which he combined with his academic polemics to produce powerful
speaking and writing for animals and animal rights.
I attended his outdoor presentations in the 1980s and later, where he said
of the Establishment versus himself: “They say we’re EXTREMISTS for caring
about animals! I AM an EXTREMIST. I am EXTREMELY against animal abuse, and I
am against it All the Time!”
This is a paraphrase of a speech I heard him give one year. It was
passionate and fiery and interesting too when you compare that oratory with
his earliest foray into animal rights in a clip from
The Animals Film
(1981) where
he appears reading from a paper with his head down, but delivering words
that echo in all of us who are working for animals and animal rights to this
day and always will.
I am eternally grateful to Professor Tom Regan for his establishment, in
philosophy and the arts, of the case for animal rights. And I am honored by
his kind words of appreciation for my own animal rights work through United
Poultry Concerns in his 2013 Interview with the Eugene Veg Education
Network, which you can – and must! – read here:
Read Eugene Veg Education
Network Interview with Tom Regan.
Read more at Tom Regan - Directory
Return to Animal Rights Articles