The abysmal suffering endured by this mouse can only be likened to a living hell - and it was all unnecessary, even prohibited. But apparently this made no difference.
As difficult as it has become to be a witness to the never-ending cacophony of animal suffering and abuse that pours out of our nation's laboratories, it would be even worse to do nothing.
Mouse imprisoned in laboratory - Image
from
AnimalsVoice.com
After 34 years of fighting to end animal experimentation, you would think
that I would have at least gotten used to the information. You would think
that there wouldn't be any new kind of dismemberment to take in, nothing I
hadn't already seen. After decades of processing the details about abuses of
dogs, cats, monkeys, rabbits, ferrets, goats, sheep, pigs, guinea pigs,
rats, mice, and other animals too numerous to mention, you would at least
think that it might not hurt so much to read about the deaths. But the pain
is still there. The horrific images generated in my mind still make me
wince. I still have tears for the innocent dead.
A two page report from the University of Notre Dame shouldn't be enough to
generate a nightmare.
One word can make it all worse. Intentional. It is much easier to talk about
negligence, carelessness, accidents. Deliberate abuse is somehow more
painful to read about. How can someone be so maligned, so warped as to
deliberately injure an animal? The page says: "a live mouse was
intentionally struck against a table." I can see the mouse. I can hear the
thunk of the impact. I can't STOP hearing it.
But that is only one small part of the horrible whole, only one of the
ghastly images. What was supposed to be a bland report is instead a
catalogue of grisly abuse. "Two (2) mice were found with missing limbs." How
did it happen? Was it more intentional abuse? Were they accidentally crushed
when closing the enclosure? Were the mice in so much pain that they attacked
their own bodies?
"Two (2) mice were found with bowels exteriorized post-surgery with sutures
and wound clips out." They were found this way -- insides spilling out. Was
the lab staff so oblivious that they hadn't noticed, or were they so callous
that they didn't care? I can only wonder how someone becomes so totally and
utterly insensitive. How does someone with medical/biological training,
someone who knows how intensely painful this must be, ignore it? How can you
care so little?
At one point I didn't believe that truly evil people existed. I used to
believe that everyone had some good inside of them. I used to believe that
everyone had the capacity to be kind, even loving. "intentionally struck
against a table . . . missing limbs . . . bowels exteriorized."
If this isn't evil then I am not sure what is.
All of this comes from one seemingly small lab inside the University of
Notre Dame. A relatively small player in terms of animal experimentation.
They don't have hundreds of grants. They apparently don't use thousands of
animals. But, they are still capable of something that can only be called
evil. They are capable of causing nightmares for both the animals and for
us.
While University of Notre Dame (South Bend, IN) may be unique in terms of
intentionality, they are certainly not unique in terms of abusing mice. The
Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) has demonstrated an excessively disturbing
ability to be fatally negligent.
The staff of the Mayo Clinic has an appalling tendency to forget to feed or
provide water to animals, specifically rats and/or mice. Their failures are
so rampant that a federal agency responsible for enforcing animal care
standards required more frequent reporting from the Mayo Clinic because the
problem was considered to be "a programmatic issue."
From April 2017 - January 2020 (approximately two and 3/4 years), over 80
mice died due to lack of food or water. Imagine waiting for days for
sustenance that never comes. Your mouth becomes irrevocably parched. The
hunger is so severe as to be painful. Then the gradual weakening until
collapse and death. Upon further examination, we have recently discovered
that the string of dehydration/starvation deaths actually goes back much
further -- all the way back to March 2015. The pile of bodies is higher that
we had realized.
The ultimate cruelty may be to refuse euthanasia to a fatally suffering
animal. To avoid this extreme abuse laboratories have instituted something
called a 'humane endpoint.' This means that the point at which animals must
be euthanized to prevent severe and needless suffering is defined before the
experiment is actually begun.
Failing to adhere to humane endpoints may be the ultimate cruelty. Keeping a
clearly suffering animal alive unnecessarily is incomprehensible. However,
the staff at the Mayo Clinic went this one better. After being ordered by
facility veterinary staff to euthanize a mouse, lab staff failed to do so,
not for a single day -- but for THREE WEEKS!
The abysmal suffering endured by this mouse can only be likened to a living
hell -- and it was all unnecessary, even prohibited. But apparently this
made no difference.
The labs always make the same kind of statements assuring us that everything
is really ok, and that they have the animals’ best interests at heart. A
spokesperson for the Mayo Clinic tells us that they "ensure animals are safe
and managed humanely in all respects.” A Notre Dame University spokesperson
stated: “Notre Dame is committed to protecting the welfare of animals used
in research."
If these statements were true in any meaningful way, then there would never
have been any reports of animal deaths/injuries/abuse filed, and we would
not be discussing these facilities. The suffering that the animals endure is
exceeded only by the hypocrisy of those institutions that are responsible
for inflicting the suffering.
As difficult as it has become to be a witness to the never-ending cacophony
of animal suffering and abuse that pours out of our nation's laboratories,
it would be even worse to do nothing. As palpably painful as the mental
images are for all of us working to end animal experimentation, it is
absolutely nothing compared to the animals' agony. And now that we know that
this takes place, we simply cannot turn away. The knowledge of the inherent
abuse which is the basis of all animal experimentation would haunt us
wherever we would go, no matter what we would do. The cries of the innocent
will always reverberate in our ears, no matter what we do.
The only recompense that comes to us arises from exposing the abusers. Their
fondest desire is simply to be anonymous, to remain hidden, to fly way under
the radar. Our goal is to rip them out of the shadows, forcing them into the
light so that the general public can see them for what they really are, and
share our dismay at the truth. If we do nothing to end it, all of us are
responsible for allowing animal experimentation to continue. Unless we are
working to empty the cages, we might as well be locking the animals in with
our own hands.
As I write this essay, an Associated Press story which reveals the animal
abuse of Notre Dame University is spreading across the internet, appearing
on over 1000 news media web pages, and creeping higher. I am saddened by the
fact that people are experiencing for themselves the shocking details of
this abuse, with irremediable pictures forced into their minds. However, I
also feel a wave of glee sweeping over me. Notre Dame University knows that
they can't hide. The individuals directly responsible for these heinous acts
know that they can't hide. They know that millions of people across the U.S.
are reading about their misdeeds. And the truth has also been broadcast
across their home town. Their friends and neighbors may know. Do people look
at them differently? Will the Notre Dame administration be angered by the
embarrassment and fire them? Will their lab be closed permanently? What
about their career?
Know this, we are nowhere near done with Notre Dame.