This is a moral matter - animal cruelty - and jobs should not be a part of that conversation..
In a recent Paulick Report article on the annual meeting of the Thoroughbred Owners of California (TOC), it was revealed that "The Stronach Group, TOC and [the] California Thoroughbred Trainers separately hired crisis management consultants," and that "the Breeders' Cup and Keeneland have retained the same crisis management firm that helped the NFL deal with the concussion crisis in football." First, this speaks to the palpable desperation - "crisis management" - of an industry exposed. But of more import, later Paulick gives us a window into their strategy:
"One thing [TOC CEO] Avioli said he's learned is that 'the argument that horses love to run doesn't work' in swaying public opinion. Promoting therapeutic aftercare programs...is a stronger message, he said, as is putting forth the economic importance of the horse industry in supplying jobs for a largely Hispanic workforce."
Yes, "love to run" is falling a bit flat these days. Perhaps because the
public is becoming clued in to the unremitting confinement to a tiny 12 by 12
stall? Or perhaps it's those ubiquitous whips that prompt any running that
is allowed to occur?
More shameful, and surprising (stupid) in that Paulick and the racing people
would allow it to become public, is the plan to (further) exploit the
industry's low-page workers and, more shameful yet, their ethnicity. Ah yes,
we mean-spirited activists are out to take jobs away from hard-working
"hispanics." We must, then, be racist. Shameful doesn't quite cover it
-
obscene is more apt.
Look, as I've written, I respect hard work, especially among the
recently-arrived to this country; this is not personal. But in the end, this
is a moral matter - animal cruelty - and jobs should not be a part of that
conversation. That said, this industry is already in decline, with a net
loss of 35 racetracks just since 2000. Where did those workers go? Perhaps
on to other jobs? Imagine that - worker mobility in a capitalist society. In
addition, all those erstwhile track-properties became something else - with
attendant new job opportunities. Let's look at one.
When 75-year-old Hollywood Park outside of Los Angeles closed in 2013, there
was great angst. What about the lost jobs, racing people asked? Well.
According to a CurbedLA article from last September, "When fully finished,
the new Hollywood Park will be made up of 2,500 units of housing, 620,000
square feet of retail space, a 'social hub' with a 'culinary marketplace'
and 'giant outdoor movie screen,' a 300-room luxury hotel, and a revamped
Hollywood Park Casino." And get this, an NFL stadium, to boot. Jobs, jobs,
jobs. Now obviously not all tracks sit on as valuable, or as large, a plot
of real estate, but you get the idea. Redevelopment means new opportunities.
The redevelopment of properties is, of course, just one manifestation of our
free-market system at work. That system has seen myriad, yes myriad,
businesses and industries come and go through our nation's history. As
demands and appetites change, as new technologies are born, our economy
adapts. One of the more famous examples also involved horses: the
horse-and-buggy being supplanted by the automobile - which, as we soon found
out, came with a plethora of new (good) jobs.
In addition, to help prepare the backstretch communities for a post-racing
life, we fully endorse job retraining - at the industry's expense. Following
is a list of the top-earning trainers in 2018. The numbers speak for
themselves:
Trainer Earnings, in the Millions
Ranking trainers from top to bottom (Chad C. Brown #1 and Robertino
Diodoro #20 **Source: EQUIBASE
Yes, retraining of their mostly minimum-wage workforce is the least these millionaires, in this multi-billion-dollar industry, can do. But in the end, I return to where I started: The preservation of jobs, no matter the number, no matter the quality, should not come at a (continued) cost of cruelty and killing. While it is dubious that Gandhi ever actually said the following, the words, whoever first uttered or wrote them, remain no less true: "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated."