The Physicians Committee has long held that infectious diseases and medications must be studied in human-relevant models, such as human cells and tissues, organoids and tissue chips, donated human tissue samples, genomic methods, and in silico, or computer model, methods.

Photo: Getty images
According to a recent complaint, part of a $375,800 National
Institutes of Health (NIH) grant was sent to a Tunisian lab “to drug
beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sand
flies so that the insects could eat them alive.”
In response, the Physicians Committee has requested that the NIH (1)
conduct an internal review to assess how these experiments were
approved and funded, (2) make that review public, and (3) make
fundamental changes to its granting policies and practices,
prioritizing ethical human-based models, so that experiments like
these do not receive funding in the future.
House of Representative members are pressing Dr. Anthony Fauci,
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID) which directed the funding, for answers in a letter
authored by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.).
Experiments on dogs and other animals remain business as usual for
NIH-funded research, which kills tens of millions of animals every
year. These experiments are deservedly criticized for their lack of
scientific value. The current scandal highlights the suffering
involved.
The Physicians Committee has long held that infectious diseases and
medications must be studied in human-relevant models, such as human
cells and tissues, organoids and tissue chips, donated human tissue
samples, genomic methods, and in silico, or computer model, methods,
as well as in carefully conducted clinical trials in human patients,
as appropriate.
“No way, no how, just no,” said John Pippin, MD, FACC. “This must be
the worst possible way for humanity to relate to man’s best
friend.”