Few conservatives acknowledge that both the right and the left
are necessary in American politics.
The following programs and services are all possible only through
government: Military and Defense; Highways / Roads and Bridges; Public
Libraries; Police and Fire Departments; Postal Service; Student Loans and
Grants; Trash Collection and Public Landfills; Farm Subsidies; the FBI and
the CIA; the Environmental Protection Agency; Social Security; Public
Schools; Jail and Prison System; Corporate / Business Subsidies; Public
Parks and Recreation; Food Stamps and Medicaid; Court System; Internal
Revenue Service; Medicare; Food and Drug Administration; Disability
Insurance; Town and State Run Beaches; Corporate Bailouts; Unemployment
Insurance; City / Metro Buses; Public Broadcasting Service; Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention; Welfare; Public Street Lighting; FEMA;
Public Defenders; CHIP; Amtrak; National Public Radio; Department of
Homeland Security; Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Department
of Agriculture; Government Scholarships; Department of Health and Human
Services; Census Bureau; Department of Energy; Customs Agency and Border
Protection; Department of Education; Secret Service; Peace Corps...
Again, few conservatives acknowledge that both the right and the left
are necessary in American politics. Government regulation is as necessary to
a prosperous society as is free enterprise! Ronald Reagan's espousal of the
free market in 1980 was extreme. When told about the possibility of Chrysler
going bankrupt, he asked in response: "What's wrong with bankruptcy?"
Chrysler went from near bankruptcy to success during the 1980s, prompting
Chrysler CEO Lee Iacocca to write his autobiography. Someone on the
political left commented that Chrysler's comeback was due to the government
stepping in, and that Lee Iacocca's autobiography was not as much an ode to
capitalism as it was to government intervention in the marketplace.
Progressive political pundit Thom Hartmann eloquently writes about the
programs and services we take for granted (see above) that are a result of
the public sphere. A balance is needed between the two extremes of 19th
century laissez-faire capitalism vs Marxism (which was discredited with the
collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc).
Again, government regulation is as necessary to a prosperous society as is
free enterprise. Without the Clean Air Act, we would be breathing dirty air
emissions from power plants; we would be drinking impure water. Without
government regulation, medicines with fatal side effects could not be pulled
off shelves and toys with lead poison would still be on the market.
Government regulation affects our housing safety, our food quality, our
driving safety (through speed limit and safety belt laws). As we live in a
civilized society, government serves as a mediator and enforcer as no
individual can do.
Gun control advocates argue along these lines: the freedom of owning a gun
has nothing to do with gun regulation. Anyone can own a car, but they still
need to register their vehicle and be licensed to drive. Everyone is free to
own a home, but they still have to observe zoning regulation and fire safety
requirements. Sensible gun laws govern manufacturing standards, product
safety, and access by minors and criminals. Sensible gun laws govern the
safety of our streets, our schools, and our homes. In 2004, guns were used
to kill: 5 people in New Zealand, 37 in Sweden, 56 in Australia, 73 in
England and Wales, 184 in Canada, and 11,344 in the United States. God bless
America.
An editorial in the school newspaper at San Diego State University in the
late 1980s commented that the American Left has always looked to Sweden as
an economic model. Back then, I personally would have preferred New Zealand
(an ecologically stable, nuclear-free zone, which protected unborn
children). But I doubt if either country (or even Canada, with its
multicultural and multilingual policies, which went metric and passed
universal health care decades ago) is an applicable model for a nation as
vast and populous as the United States…
…The American Empire is how Washington DC investigative journalist William
Blum describes the United States in Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s
Only Remaining Superpower (Common Courage Press, 2000).
And considering the fact that in this country the burden of taxes falls
squarely on the middle class, I think it’s reasonable to demand the wealthy,
corporations, etc. pay their fair share! Bernie Sanders notes the sad irony
of "the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history
of the world, having a crumbling infrastructure with roads, bridges, water
systems, wastewater plants, airports, rail, levees and dams falling
apart..."
Apart from laissez-faire capitalism allowing corporations to go bankrupt and
resulting in mass unemployment, the laissez-faire capitalism of the 19th
century is espoused today by libertarians. There is a certain
philosophical consistency in being laissez-faire on both social as well as
economic issues, but I personally find the libertarian position distasteful
because it would abolish programs and services many of us take for
granted (see above).
My dear friend Rose Evans (1928 - 2015), editor and publisher of
Harmony: Voices for a Just Future, a peace and justice periodical on
the religious left, once cited the example of libertarians wanting to
abolish public education as an example of how extremist a political
philosophy it really is!
So let's have a serious discussion about socialism in America.
Go on to: Soul Meets Body
Return to: Articles
Return to: The Writings of Vasu Murti