Do 'single-issue' campaigns block the advancement of animal liberation and veganism?
Listen to Thinking Like a Chicken Podcast, June 15, 2023. Transcript below.
Photo by Barak Mayer, courtesy of Meat the Victims.
Today’s podcast reflects an article I wrote a few years ago in
response to the claim by some members of the animal advocacy
community that what they call “single-issue” campaigns blocks the
advancement of animal liberation and veganism.
So I am in Brooklyn, New York on a fall day looking at a stack of
crates on the sidewalk filled with live chickens. Sickened by this
sight, do I, as an animal rights activist, just skip over the
chickens and proceed to tell anyone who will listen to Go Vegan?
What if a passerby is upset about the chickens crammed in the crates
without food, water or shelter, and asks what can be done to help
them? Do I simply say that these particular chickens are suffering
for a sacrificial ritual, then move on to note that the ritual,
while totally cruel, is no worse than what chickens go through in
slaughterhouses every day, urge the person to Go Vegan and proceed
to expound the philosophy of Abolition or Nothing?
Will ignoring the chickens in front of our eyes advance the
abolition of all animal abuse better than if we paid attention to
these particular victims who are helplessly suffering right in front
of us?
For some Abolitionists, all campaigns focusing on particular
animals—in this case chickens used for a brutal sacrifice—frustrate the ultimate, worldwide goal of Abolition, Animal Rights,
and Veganism. (Veganism most broadly is a philosophic and practical
commitment to justice, compassion, and nonviolence.) My
organization, United Poultry Concerns, promotes the compassionate
and respectful treatment of domesticated birds with a focus on birds
in the agribusiness sector. Does our focus hamper efforts to
liberate all animals from all forms of oppression everywhere on the
planet?
A point to consider is that every category of animal, animal abuse,
and advocacy can be called “single issue,” whether the category is
Chickens, Farmed Animals, Furbearing Animals, Aquatic Animals,
Rodeos, SeaWorld, Save the Elephants, Vivisection, or other
categories.
Campaigns on behalf of specific human groups have been waged
throughout history. Was the campaign to end Apartheid in South
Africa a “single-issue” campaign that thwarted the overall effort to
liberate people everywhere from legalized discrimination? What about
the women’s movement or the civil rights movement or the LGBTQ
movement in America? Aren’t they “single issues” within the
universal drive for social justice? And do they not break down
further into specific campaigns for voting rights, equal opportunity
in education, housing, sports, and employment?
If so, then we must ask whether addressing a particular category of
animals or animal abuse necessarily precludes advocacy on behalf of
all animals. Does focusing on chickens prevent me from putting their
suffering within a broader range of issues? My experience as a
Chicken Rights activist for 33 years, since 1990, says that one can
develop the skills to do this while pursuing specific objectives.
One can, because a focused objective and the Big Picture are not
separate. Cockfighting, for example, is one “detail” within the
larger dimension of staged animal fights within the broad category
of using animals for entertainment. Using animals for entertainment
is part of an entire system of animal abuse in which the individuals
of other species are defined by humans as property, objects,
commodities and resources, without dignity or rights.
Paradoxically, instead of a “detail” versus “dimension” divide
(“single issue” versus Big Picture), the dimensions are in the
details and vice versa, similar to the paradox of individuality and
ecology. “I am in the world, the world is in me,” is how the
philosopher Alfred North Whitehead summarized the cosmic interaction
between the Unit and the Ubiquity.
Closed Circle Campaigns
"Eat Wings" ticket from Lewis and Clark Humane Society
That said, not all single issues are the same. Some are closed circles. An example of a closed circle approach to helping animals is where one group of exploited animals is used as bait to win funding and favor for another group. A fundraiser for dogs and cats featuring a chicken dinner, reassuring your member of Congress that while you oppose experimenting on animals you have no objection to hunting, fishing or eating them—this type of advocacy is a closed circle. By contrast, even though United Poultry Concerns focuses on the plight of birds in the food industry, we would not hold a fundraiser featuring a lobster dinner or raffle a fur coat to raise money for our chicken sanctuary. We would not lobby Congress for chickens at the expense of other animals.
I hope you’ve found today’s topic interesting and useful. Thank you
very much for listening, and please join me for the next podcast
episode of
Thinking Like a Chicken—News & Views. And have a
wonderful day!