If we are genuinely committed to animal liberation, we need a more pragmatic approach that yields tangible results. Here are three reasons why protesting LVMH [Louis Vuitton]or any company without a fur-free policy for exotic skins is harmful.
As an animal rights organization, CAFT USA has forced 9 fashion
conglomerates to enact fur-free policies. While some may attribute
our success to being the loudest voice in the room, the truth lies
in our focused approach and reasonable demands. Aggressive tactics
and overnight vegan expectations may garner attention online, but
they do little to serve the animals we fight for.
If we are genuinely committed to animal liberation, we need a more
pragmatic approach that yields tangible results.
Here are three reasons why protesting LVMH or any company without a
fur-free policy for exotic skins is harmful.
1. Leverage is Lost
Companies go fur-free when targeted by the grassroots for one simple
reason: they want the protests to stop.
If LVMH or any other brand believes protests will continue even if
the demand to go fur-free is met then why would they go fur-free in
the first place?
It is vital that we stick to our word on this issue because it can
make future negotiations between companies lack a positive outcome.
For this reason CAFT USA also does not protest any companies that
have recently gone fur-free for any issue related to animal rights.
This is an act of goodwill to ensure positive outcomes for future
campaigns.
2. LVMH does not care:
Not only is LVMH not dropping exotics any time soon, they are in the
news bragging about their investments.
LVMH has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into crocodile
farming. They currently employ over 500 people dedicated to exotic
skins and in 2019 LVMH launched the first standard for responsible
crocodile farming.
Does this sound like a company on the brink of banning exotics? We
think not.
3. Results Matter
While this may be a hard reality for animal rights activists it is
important to remember that our personal feelings are irrelevant. The
foxes on fur farms do not care how hard we tried, they care about
our success in taking another step towards the end of fur.
Similarly, the crocodiles awaiting a violent death in LVMH farms in
Louisiana and Australia are no better off if we fight for them and
fail. Due to LVMH’s current position on exotics, failure is
inevitable.
Conclusion:
Protesting LVMH for exotics indagers the success of the anti-fur
movement.
Exotic skins are here to stay in the immediate future for LVMH.
Confusing our demands to encompass both fur and exotics makes
convincing them to adopt a fur-free policy nearly impossible.
Fur is a stepping stone in the fight for animal liberation.
Together, through well planned steps forward, we will see a day that
no fox, bobcat or crocodile will be used as a product for luxury and
greed.